Search for: "State v. L. B." Results 4141 - 4160 of 6,570
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2011, 1:18 am by John Hochfelder
H&L Holding Corp. (1st Dept. 2007) - $10,000,000 ($5,000,000 past - 3 1/2 years, $5,000,000 future - 35 years) for a 45 year old man whose torso was impaled on a steel bar that severed his spinal cord and left him with complete paralysis and neurological dysfunction at and below the L-2 level Ruby v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 11:00 am by Chuck Ramsay
  Urge them to become a member immediately to defend you against the state's unscientific breath test machine. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 1:42 am by centerforartlaw
Another significant legal battle involving murals and VARA unfolded in the case of Kerson v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 9:15 am
What the national court wished to know, in essence, was whether the InfoSoc Directive rights of reproduction (Article 2(b)) and making available to the public (Article 3(2)) preclude a Member State from providing a rebuttable presumption that a performer has authorized the fixation and exploitation of their performances where that performer is involved in the recording of an audiovisual work so that it may be broadcast.The decisionIn providing a response to this question, the CJEU… [read post]
5 May 2009, 3:56 pm
Mr N was moved to B&B on the day the letter was received. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
 Nothing in this Ordinance shall prohibit an entity authorized by state law to dispense Medical Marijuana from making deliveries of Medical Marijuana to the residence or business of an authorized individual or health care facility as permitted by relevant state law, subject to the applicable requirements of this Ordinance. [read post]