Search for: "State v. Maker" Results 4141 - 4160 of 4,682
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2014, 9:23 am by John Gregory
The answer to that is generally negative, thanks to the Supreme Court of Canada’s ruling in Crookes v Newton in 2011. [read post]
20 May 2019, 5:49 am
Again in a lovely vernal day, the Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology, and Society (TILT), for the 6th time, has brought together researchers, practitioners, policy makers, and civil society at the intersection of law and regulation, technology, and society to share insights, exchange ideas and formulate answers to contemporary challenges related to technological innovation, at the TILTing Perspectives 2019 Conference.Opening speech The conference was very well-attended. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:13 am
  The same happened in the aftermath of the Puffin/Penguin case [United Biscuits v Asda, noted here]. [read post]
8 May 2014, 11:21 pm by Florian Mueller
I need to focus on my app (in connection with which my first patent application got filed on Wednesday).I just have a few high-level thoughts to share about Apple v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 2:39 am
These include information on the applicant's race, religion, national origin, age, pregnancy status, marital status, disability, sexual orientation (some state and local jurisdictions), gender expression or identity (some state and local jurisdictions) and genetic information. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 2:10 pm
At a glance, I can see that there is a good deal with which I agree and a good deal with which I disagree.A recent opinion in the area is State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Its makers are protected by the right to freedom of expression – a cornerstone of modern democratic society that protects academics, journalists and musicians from censorship when their speech challenges those in power. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:43 pm by Pace Law School Library
  State regulation of air pollution fromoffshore ships is upheld in PacificMerchant Shipping Ass’n v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
That was the question that was asked of the New Jersey Supreme Court in Emma v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
She systematically mapped the scope of state-based and individual-based protections against espionage, surveillance and data collection (relying in particular on the U.N. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt)   Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:48 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
As you said in the lead in to this, he's been the head since its inception and he really has taken the state a long distance. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:34 am
Supreme Court will almost certainly extend the scope of the Second Amendment right to bear arms to limit state and federal regulation of firearms, based on oral arguments in McDonald v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:59 am by Andres
What the German proposal states is that something similar can be arranged for all platforms which share images and memes. [read post]