Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 5,862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 6:36 am
When the Court granted review in Global Tech Appliances, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/288609.opn.doc.pdf State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:22 pm
Only two Justices, Justices Ginsburg and Sotomayor, dissented. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 9:28 am
Today the justices granted review in the case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:45 pm
I first wrote about this case, Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:48 am
The leading case right now is United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:04 am
Supreme Court 9-0 ruling in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 2:49 pm
I realize that there are grounds for distinguishing the two sets of statements if one is so inclined - Justice Scalia's opinion was talking about state courts, Judge Sotomayor also said that the courts of appeals "make policy," and so on. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
From the moment the Supreme Court granted cert in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 5:16 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 11:56 pm
Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:36 pm
In Holder v. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 1:08 pm
During the 2019 reargument in Knick v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 4:22 pm
In the 1963 case Brady v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 9:07 am
Justice Kagan dissented, joined by Justices Breyer and Sotomayor. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 9:57 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
SOTOMAYOR: The court's decision in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:09 pm
Justice Kavanaugh with opinion in Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 8:16 am
United States (19), and American Legion (14). [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In an earlier Second Circuit case, where the court only touched on the issue in dictum, then-Judge Sonia Sotomayor, in her dissent, stated that RFRA’s language leads to the conclusion that it could only be applicable in suits involving the government. [read post]
