Search for: "State v. South" Results 4141 - 4160 of 10,948
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2009, 7:02 am
The Court said it would hear oral argument, presumably at its next Term, on a report by  a Special Master on the pending  dispute between the two Carolina states (South Carolina v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 9:31 pm
It follows that any order made by this Court can affect only immovable property of the deceased in New South Wales; it cannot affect movable property in New South Wales, nor any property outside the State. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:52 am
As to how this case arose, the Court of Appeals explains that Handshoe, who is a Mississippi citizen, owns and operates Slabbed.org, a public-affairs blog with the tagline `Alternative New Media for the Gulf South. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 10:03 am
 In Armenia (and on Facebook), anyway.But in the United States, apparently, there are only two. [read post]
27 May 2015, 12:08 pm
 Plus, the panel tells everyone that it's a guy who "grew up in the South" and who was incarcerated there in 1976 at the age of 17; e.g., a southerner who's now 56 years old.I'd be stunned if the folks at San Quentin can't figure out which one of them that is. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 10:53 am
In a recent prebid protest presented by our firm, Payne Hackenbracht & Sullivan, the United States Court of Federal Claims considered the protest of Weeks Marine, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
By order to show cause, summons, and verified complaint dated April 26, 2006, Great South Bay and its principals commenced an action in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, against SDLH, its principals, and the respondent entitled Great South Bay Automotive, Inc. v SDLH Automotive Inc., under Index No. 12040/06. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 2:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
By order to show cause, summons, and verified complaint dated April 26, 2006, Great South Bay and its principals commenced an action in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, against SDLH, its principals, and the respondent entitled Great South Bay Automotive, Inc. v SDLH Automotive Inc., under Index No. 12040/06. [read post]