Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 4,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2010, 12:07 am
It doesn't call for everything to be free, it calls for WIPO implementation, and it emphasizes that updating the law means accounting for both creator and consumer needs. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:49 am
Ill, 1983)Sega v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 6:00 am
Passing off, on the other hand, protects a right of property in business or goodwill. [read post]
11 May 2010, 12:26 pm
Id. at *16-17.The Hale court then considered plaintiffs’ claim of violation of state consumer protection laws. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today. [read post]
10 May 2010, 7:20 am
[Local Loan Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
However, if we don't wise up in time, U.S. farmers will find agriculture off-shored, too, "for our own good. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 10:32 am
Don't mess with Staples. [read post]
5 May 2010, 4:13 am
• Regulation 1383/2003 does not fulfil the reasonability standard set forth in GATTArticle V:4. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
Environmental Protection Agency to clean up a petroleum spill at Smitty’s Conoco, its former gas station located on the Yakama Reservation. [read post]
3 May 2010, 4:00 am
That concept of selling the soul isn’t just true of politicians, of course. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
(IPKat) Future revision of the EU trade mark system – revised draft Council conclusions (BLOG@IP::JUR) TMView’s up and running: tell your friends! [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:47 pm
A few of these decisions seem to pop up every year. [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:58 am
We don’t have to vote for the old guys v. the new guys. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 12:09 pm
For more on the interplay between marketing representations and 230, see, e.g.: * 47 USC 230 and Consumer Protection Talk Notes * 47 USC 230 Talk at Fordham * Ninth Circuit Mucks Up 47 USC 230 Jurisprudence....AGAIN!? [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:28 pm
Guidance Endodontics, LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:24 am
The case is Dukes v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 1:59 pm
Now, the courts may protect you because you are stupid, but you haven't been coerced. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 11:14 am
I typically represent homeowners or small business owners in negotiations with banks and other creditors, or in protecting consumer rights though use of the Bankrutpcy code. [read post]
