Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Heard"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 7,747
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2014, 11:40 am
READ PARTS I-V (pp. 101-138 in SSRN version). [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 12:30 am
This is partly because Strasbourg’s guidance is not very clear [our interview took place before the ECHR’s recent decision in Firth & Ors v UK (App No 47784/09)] and also because our sentencing legislation is such a minefield. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
He acknowledged the conduct (some of which he had heard in person), but took no action. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 5:07 pm
We have all been hearing about the primary races for Governor and Lieutenant Governor, although polls tell us that lots of people haven’t heard of Zephyr Teachout and Tim Wu, or if they’ve heard the names don’t know why. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:41 pm
Walker—was heard with its equivalent from Indiana—Baskin v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:15 am
Oral arguments in Zivostofsky v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 3:18 pm
Cobane v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals regarding important expert testimony requires the appellate court to order a new trial, regardless of whether there was actually any substantive error in the expert testimony heard or not heard by the jury. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
The basics of that process at the heart of the common law system, in contemporary language, include notice, an opportunity to be heard, consistency, predictability and appeal to ensure accountability. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 12:39 pm
While we disagree with these states' marriage laws, we are clearly on the same page about one thing – these people, and the larger issue of marriage equality, deserve to be heard in the Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 12:51 pm
” Marbury v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 7:27 am
Here’s the introduction: In June 2014, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Riley v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 4:10 am
Yesterday the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Baskin v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:43 pm
” Prosecutor v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:01 pm
Via Katfriend and occasional contributor Paul England (Taylor Wessing) we have now heard the fate of that case from his colleague Anja Lunze (katpat!). [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 12:24 pm
The Second Circuit heard oral argument in the ACLU’s other challenge to the telephone records collection, ACLU v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 12:11 am
The right has gone, but the discretion in the hands of an independent judiciary should surely have maintained that right in cases such as these – where a man who is a public servant and representative of the people is accused of breaching the ethical standards implicit in his very important role. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court said in Arizona v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 3:01 am
It is now styled as Florida Workers' Advocates v. [read post]
