Search for: "Victory v. State"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 6,924
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2015, 8:57 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 12:39 pm
In Hellweg v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:25 am
Max Rack, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 6:15 pm
(And it stays there).United States v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 7:13 am
The court also found that even after the federal government rescinded its agreement with the Sheriff's office authorizing officers to enforce certain provisions of immigration law, and after the Supreme Court made clear in Arizona v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 10:42 am
Their only power -- to seek state punishment for rule violators -- is a regressive function. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:18 am
First up is Hernández v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 2:21 pm
. - In the matter of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 2:21 pm
. - In the matter of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:47 pm
This chapter retraces the publishers’ victory in abolishing stamp duty taxes which used to apply to newspapers. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:35 pm
The case is United State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 11:03 am
Last Term's decision in Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 2:49 pm
One can only wonder if the original pleading was similarly adorned:IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDATHE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,v. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 12:41 am
Yesterday's Epic Games v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 7:16 pm
Convergence was once at the heart of the vision of the world once dearly held by the Americans after 1945 as the vanguard force of the alliance victorious against the forces of global fascism (but not entirely convinced about the moral character of Soviet totalitarianism even after its bad behaviors from the late 1920s). [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 8:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 7:41 pm
They're really one.Heins takes her title from Felix Frankfurter's concurring opinion in Weiman v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 10:14 am
The University of Alabama Board of Trustees v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 11:13 am
Bryza is suggesting that a lame-duck President who, I hope, will have been soundly repudiated in November by the victory of Obama-Biden, would view himself as having the legitimate authority to bind the United States to the defense of Georgia's territorial integrity (at least if one takes Article V of NATO seriously). [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:31 pm
It was also addressed by the doctrine of Swift v. [read post]
