Search for: ". Kerr" Results 4161 - 4180 of 6,254
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2011, 11:54 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) I have just posted a first draft of a very short essay, Why Courts Should Not Quantify Probable Cause, which is forthcoming as a book chapter in a volume dedicated to the late Professor William Stuntz. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 11:29 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
CRIMINAL OPINIONS Habeas Corpus Ineffective assistance; plea bargaining Where a state prisoner claims he would have accepted a plea agreement if his attorney had correctly conveyed it to him, and no evidentiary hearing was held, the district court should have held a hearing on the prisoner’s ineffective assistance claim. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:42 am by Glenn Reynolds
ORIN KERR: A Significant Test Case in Seattle on the Lawfulness of Ex Ante Search Limitations in Computer Warrants. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:35 am
Orin Kerr on Volokh Conspiracy: Significant Test Case in Seattle on Lawfulness of Ex Ante Search Limitations in Computer Warrants about a February opinion unsealed in Seattle about protocol for computer searches: In The Matter Of The United States Of America’s Application For A Search Warrant To Seize And Search Electronic Devices From Edward Cunnius applying the Ninth Circuit's Comprehensive Drug Testing case: It didn’t take long, it seems. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:03 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) In a recent article, Ex Ante Regulation of Computer Search and Seizure, 96 Va. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 5:52 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Kerr, George Washington University - Law School, Date posted to database: January 26,... [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 12:55 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Commenter Richard Riley brings up an interesting point I haven’t seen mentioned before: Justice Scalia’s concurrence in Cruzan v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Blog Editorial
On Monday 28 March, Peter Stewart v The Queen will be heard by Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 3:29 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) What’s on your mind? [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:40 am by Fiona de Londras
Related PostsNovember 24, 2009 -- Arrest for the purpose of DNA sampling (0)November 22, 2009 -- Lord Kerr on the Relationship between ECtHR and Domestic Courts (3) [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 10:59 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) For those interested, the oral argument audio in Davis, which I argued at the Supreme Court on Monday, is now available here. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:55 am
 Professor Orin Kerr of George Washington Law School says no (PDF). [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:46 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) On Monday, the Second Circuit handed down a very important decision on standing to challenge secret surveillance programs in Amnesty International USA v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:02 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Brian Leiter has posted a fascinating interview with Ronald J. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:15 am by Eric E. Johnson
Based on the quotes in the story, Hill’s got himself some excellent lawyers They are David Kerr and Luke Santangelo of Fort Collins, Colorado. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:49 am by Nabiha Syed
Circuit, while Lyle Denniston of this blog explores the complex arguments advanced by Orin Kerr in Davis. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:11 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) The Virginia Law Review in Brief has posted a response from Professor Paul Ohm to my recent article, Ex Ante Regulation of Computer Search and Seizure. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 6:56 pm by David Oscar Markus
That scenario, Kerr said, would mean the Supreme Court was merely issuing “advisory opinions,” and defense lawyers would see no reason to go for such unhelpful results. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:23 pm by Lyle Denniston
Kerr offered to the Justices in Davis v. [read post]