Search for: "Any and All Under-TenantsĀ " Results 4161 - 4180 of 4,958
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2010, 2:22 pm by NL
And a further layer of phone advice before any referral to a face to face provider? [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:54 am by J
In OM Ltd v New River Head RTM Co Ltd [2010] UKUT 394 (LC), the appellant was the former manager of the property, being the management company under the lease. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:54 am by J
In OM Ltd v New River Head RTM Co Ltd [2010] UKUT 394 (LC), the appellant was the former manager of the property, being the management company under the lease. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 10:51 pm by Tessa Shepperson
For example to carry out repairs, and to show any empty rooms to prospective new tenants. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 5:50 pm by Howard Knopf
Even if the proposed inclusion of the word "education" is passed by Parliament, any "dealing" would have to pass the six part fairness test laid down by the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 6:06 am by Tessa Shepperson
It could mean that a landlord who was just one day late, could never recover his property under section 21. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 10:22 am by The Legal Blog
Section 107 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 stipulates that a lease of immovable property from year to year, or for any term exceeding 1 year can be made only by and under a registered instrument. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 10:39 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Do you or your company have any exciting plans for the future? [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 11:08 am by David Smith
In short: The authorities in this area all say that the underlying principle is one of estoppel. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:53 am by Christopher Bird
The Correctional Service of Canada cross-appealed, arguing that the CBC should not have had any access to the exhibits. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 10:45 pm by Rosalind English
Accordingly, the furthest this point goes is to suggest that a local authority, when deciding to bring possession proceedings against a demoted tenant, should take into account its duty under section 17, as well as the article 8 Convention rights of the tenant and any other Convention rights that may be in play. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:24 pm by NL
I find it difficult to conclude that it actually is because taking the view I do of what is meant by enjoyment, I ask whether there is any term or condition under which he is entitled to enjoy the premises in the landlord and tenant sense the observance or benefit of which is rendered more difficult as a consequence of his epilepsy. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:24 pm by NL
I find it difficult to conclude that it actually is because taking the view I do of what is meant by enjoyment, I ask whether there is any term or condition under which he is entitled to enjoy the premises in the landlord and tenant sense the observance or benefit of which is rendered more difficult as a consequence of his epilepsy. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
Any person at risk of an interference of this magnitude should in principle be able to have the proportionality of the measure determined by an independent tribunal in the light of the relevant principles under Art.8 of the Convention, notwithstanding that, under domestic law, his right of occupation has come to an end. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
Any person at risk of an interference of this magnitude should in principle be able to have the proportionality of the measure determined by an independent tribunal in the light of the relevant principles under Art.8 of the Convention, notwithstanding that, under domestic law, his right of occupation has come to an end. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:39 am by Adam Wagner
A demotion order was made against him under the provisions of the Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003, on the basis of a number of incidents of serious anti-social behaviour caused by all members of Mr Pinnock’s family (other than Mr Pinnock himself) at or near the property. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:38 pm by Tessa Shepperson
A landlord can’t just sell a property from under a Protected Tenant. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 8:48 am by John G. Kelly
 A landlord will often provide that exclusive use restrictions are subject to the rights of tenants under existing leases. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 12:10 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
I explain all this to Edna but bless her, she doesn’t want to cause a fuss and is too intimidated by Earl to cooperate with any action against him and Mr Khan. [read post]