Search for: "BAKER v. BAKER"
Results 4161 - 4180
of 4,846
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
It would be odd and potentially onerous if, even while the authority were simply considering the merits of the claimant’s position, they were unable to house the family in two adjoining units even on a temporary basis.Further, Scott Baker J in R v Ealing London Borough Council ex parte Surdonja [1999] 1 ALL ER 566 took the view that:“In my judgment the obligation is not discharged by providing split accommodation in separate dwellings. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
(Baker Donelson). [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
(Baker Donelson). [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
Dukes v. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 10:01 am
" Ward v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:20 am
Maybe my top ten will become a baker's dozen. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:37 am
The case is called Thorogood v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm
The case is Parker et al. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 6:49 am
In Fulton v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 1:01 am
Of note, in the 2011 case Lynch, et al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm
The case is Parker et al. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 2:43 pm
In cases such as Baker v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 12:50 pm
Ginsburg had an opportunity to revisit a similar question about thirty years later, when delivering the opinion of the Court in Baker v General Motor Corp (522 US 222 (1998)). [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 8:04 am
In Carson v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:39 am
Baker (E.D. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 6:30 am
As an initial matter, a majority of the Court has only employed the political question doctrine twice since 1964 (the year Baker v. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 11:51 am
"); Baker v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:54 am
Baker, 440 Mass. 519 (2003). [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:31 am
A hundred and twenty years later, the Warren Court flirted with the revival of the Guarantee Clause in the famous apportionment cases, Baker v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 4:15 pm
One is to address the problem of “negative value claims” as described by the court in Baker v. [read post]
