Search for: "Black v. United States"
Results 4161 - 4180
of 4,858
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2024, 6:02 am
And on the international stage, they have adopted counterterrorism rhetoric to mobilize support or deflect criticism – accusing other States of making statements “in support of terrorism,” urging supporters of the pending ICJ case (South Africa v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
: (IPEG), ISPs, what's a patent worth, climate change and IP audit mistakes: (StrategicIP), Patent trolls - the pot calling the pot black: (IPEG), Nokia's new music service - sensible DRM? [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 6:15 am
In State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
In State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 3:14 pm
Beginning in 2011, OUR Walmart’s stated goal was to improve the working conditions of all Walmart employees. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:09 pm
I also think the Supreme Court was right in Cohen v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:35 am
During a unit search on July 11, 2007, all of my writing paper wasconfiscated and all of Steve Champion's reference books were taken. [read post]
28 May 2014, 6:19 am
He also asserted that there had never been a black deportation officer in the Boston field office. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 8:00 pm
Vance, STATE LAW PREFERENCE ACTIONS: STILL ALIVE AFTER SHERWOOD PARTNERS V. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
Likewise with Muir v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:30 am
Salim v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 12:31 am
The sad thing about this book is that it reflects the notion that the dialogue over the intellectual commons is an exclusively United States affair, which is by and large true. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 4:44 pm
Granston stressed that in declined cases, the government is a “third party” as described in United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:06 am
The issues were: (1) whether ECHR Article 8 was engaged; (2) whether the SWP’s activities were “in accordance with the law”; and (3) whether the SWP’s activities were “necessary in a democratic society” in the interests of one of the objectives stated in Article 8(2), in accordance with the four-part test set out by the UK Supreme Court in Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) [2014] AC 700. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 3:29 pm
“They are ‘owned by, produced by or for, or . . . under the control of the United States Government. . . . [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:37 am
The concept is still rather wooly, but the approach remains that of Lord Bingham in M v Secretary of States for Work and Pensions [2006] 2 AC 91, encapsulated by Lady Hale as “the closer the facts come to the protection of the core values of the substantive article, the more likely it is that they fall within its ambit. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
By now, the United States has had the experience of having a woman of color serve as Vice President—the first time someone who is not white or not a man has held that office. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 1:04 pm
United States, a case involving federal sentencing laws that – at least according to the defendant – turns on whether the word “and” in the federal law at issue means “and” or instead “or. [read post]
