Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C" Results 4161 - 4180 of 4,551
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2009, 10:21 pm
In today’s case (Smagh v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:25 pm
There is no duty to warn of dangers that are obvious or a matter of common knowledge (see for example, Bogle and others v McDonalds Restaurants Ltd [2002] All ER (D) 436 where the court found that McDonalds were not negligent in supplying cups of hot tea and coffee without a warning as consumers generally knew that there was a risk of scalding if hot drinks were spilled). [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:02 pm
We do not represent or warrant that the information available on or through the Site will be correct, accurate, timely or otherwise reliable. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 9:59 am
But I'm not sure they'd either (1) would, or (2) should prevail.I'm on board for (c)(3). [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 11:07 am
Clarke's share of the sale proceeds to the business debt.The Royal Bank relied on section 1, of the Fraudulent Conveyance Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 163, which says (in not-so-plain language):1 If made to delay, hinder or defraud creditors and others of their just and lawful remedies(a) a disposition of property, by writing or otherwise,(b) a bond,(c) a proceeding, or(d) an orderis void and of no effect against a person or the person's assignee or personal… [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
(Editor’s Note: This post is based on a client memorandum by Jonathan C. [read post]