Search for: "Doe VI "
Results 4161 - 4180
of 5,650
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2011, 5:32 am
As Wikipedia explains, jury instructions “are the set of legal rules that jurors should follow when the jury is deciding a civil or criminal case. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:32 am
” Reading the a.35.5 rule against the broader principle of judicial independence, Kingsmill-Moore J held that it would only preclude taxes that would ““worsen [a judge’s] position vis-a-vis the rest of the citizens of the State”. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:56 pm
In addition, it does not offer any significant countervailing benefits.ISDA believes that the "15 second delay" requirement needs clarification and should not apply to RFQs. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
Click here for the complete S&C publication - Conflicts of Interest in Securitizations. [1] Section 3(a)(77) of the Securities Exchange Act provides that the term “asset-backed security”: “(A) means a fixed-income or other security collateralized by any type of self-liquidating financial asset (including a loan, a lease, a mortgage, or a secured or unsecured receivable) that allows the holder of the security to receive payments that depend primarily on cash flow from the… [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 10:37 am
Kuehner, past cases demand that the court consider each plaintiff vis-à-vis each defendant, it said. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
But this case is a very good example of a judicial decision resting on inadequate data, putting the Home Secretary in the “unenviable position” vis a vis the Immigration Rules policy. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:37 pm
Now, collection of the judgment is based on a defendant's actual level of responsibility for an injury so long as that defendant is not found by the jury to be 60 per cent or more negligent vis a vis the other defendants. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:48 pm
[65] An ad hoc fiduciary relationship is one that does not fall within the traditional categories of fiduciary relationships. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:08 am
But with VIEs it is different and Bishop does not address our main point (note again that his post came before ours). [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
In fact, Chapter VI of the U.N. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
In fact, Chapter VI of the U.N. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:28 am
Even if the Chinese regulators doe not take this drastic step, it is now clear that the contractual arrangements on which the various VIEs are based are in clear violation of Chinese law. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 11:13 pm
Also I am extremely worried about your evasion vis a vis the pony issue. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 10:46 am
While following the dicta laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, the Court held that property devolving under S. 8 of the Hindu Succession Act would be self acquired property of an individual vis-a-vis his sons. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 4:36 am
The term does not include – (A) any officer or employee of a creditor while, in the name of the creditor, collecting debts for such creditor; (B) any person while acting as a debt collector for another person, both of whom are related by common ownership or affiliated by corporate control, if the person acting as a debt collector does so only for persons to whom it is so related or affiliated and if the principal business of such person is not the collection of debts; (C) any… [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 1:05 pm
Not only does it provide the restructuring of existing debts, but it allows the federal bankruptcy court to do what the state courts cannot. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 11:10 pm
Why does this matter in a smartphone, considering that you are not trying to use an iPhone to decode the human genome? [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:48 pm
The Third Arbitration Trilogy: Stolt-Nielsen, Rent-A-Center, Concepcion and the Future of American Arbitration American Review of International Arbitration, 2012Thomas Stipanowich Pepperdine University School of Law Abstract: For the third time in the modern era, a triad of key Supreme Court decisions represents a milestone in American arbitration. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:05 pm
A member need not receive any share in the joint estate but may renounce his interest therein; his renunciation merely extinguishes his interest in the estate but does not affect that status of the remaining members vis-a-vis the family property. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:19 pm
So — no Henry VI Part II quotes. [read post]
