Search for: "Does 1 - 38"
Results 4161 - 4180
of 4,952
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2022, 3:00 am
State, 623 S.W.3d 38 (Tex. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 7:12 pm
The SEC’s argument goes like this: 1. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:46 pm
One of the major components of this legislation is the reinstatement of the Federal R&D Credit retroactively to January 1, 2010. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 10:00 pm
The age range was nine months to 38 years. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:19 pm
See, e.g., Jacobson, 197 U.S. at 34–38 (discussing the voluminous medical evidence in support of vaccination); Hellerstedt, 136 S. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:41 pm
That is their right and their duty. [38] For these reasons the plaintiff's application for further particulars is granted. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 11:00 am
Of those, 7 (38% of the total) involved a domestic conflict. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
(Section 5.8 of the Code does contemplate ADR processes “on agreement of the parties”.) [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
” 1 Cranch 137, 177 (1803). [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 1:50 am
Table 1. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:58 am
As a consequence of this shift, the limitation on interest deductibility is anticipated to raise significantly more federal revenue after 2021 than it does initially. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
Section 4(f) provides that the Secretary of Transportation may approve a transportation project "requiring the use of . . . land of an historic site . . . only if: (1) there is no prudent and feasible alternative to using that land; and (2) the . . . project includes all possible planning to minimize harm to the . . . historic site . . . . [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
Read pp 74-81__________Inter-Systemic Harmonization And Its Challenges For The Legal-StateLarry Catá BackerHiiL Law of the Future Series, The Law of the Future and the Future of Law(Sam Muller, Stavros Zouridis, Laura Kistemaker and Morly Frishman, eds., The Hague, Netherlands: Torkel Opsahi Academic Editor, forthcoming 2011).1. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
In addition to overturning the physical presence substantial nexus standard applicable to use tax collection requirements articulated by the court in Quill[1] and Bellas Hess[2], the Court’s far reaching opinion in Wayfair creates an undefined sufficiency test for determining when a taxpayer has substantial nexus with a state for purposes of the dormant Commerce Clause. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
The merger of the largest American cable company with one of the largest entertainment enterprises in the world would give the combined entity control over approximately one out of every five viewing hours in the United States. [1] Not surprisingly, the deal will be heavily scrutinized and raise considerable questions of antitrust law, media diversity, and the future of internet usage. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm
That rationale does not apply to online platforms. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 11:11 am
If that study does not confirm a significant clinical benefit, then the drug should probably be withdrawn. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 2:06 pm
" Id. at *1 n.1. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 4:23 am
What does this mean? [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 10:50 am
We concluded 47 criminal cases against 83 defendants, obtaining nearly 21 years in confinement and over $38 million in criminal fines, restitution, community service funds and special assessments. [read post]
