Search for: "Fell v. Fell" Results 4161 - 4180 of 12,743
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2017, 9:41 am by BECKY STEELS
This was because an individual previously charged with a “relevant sexual offence” (as detailed in the 2009 Act, sch 1), under which the charges brought against AB when he was fourteen fell, is precluded from relying on the reasonable belief defence. [read post]
10 May 2017, 7:49 am by Lefteris K. Travayiakis, Esq.
One of the issues on appeal before the SJC in this case was the reliance by the defendants of a United States Supreme Court Case, Florida v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 9:06 am by ALEX BAILIN QC MATRIX
That was the question which fell to be decided recently in SXH v CPS. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:31 am by Joy Waltemath
” The court also found that the employee stated plausible claims for sexual orientation discrimination, hostile work environment, and retaliation based on allegations of many discriminatory remarks, exclusion from meetings and projects, and termination soon after he complained (Philpott v. [read post]