Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court"
Results 4161 - 4180
of 6,581
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2007, 8:23 am
The Supreme Court's decision states that it granted review because the decision in this case was in conflict with a nearly simultaneous Fourth District Court of Appeal decision. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 8:18 pm
Supreme Court’s Analysis Under Glassman v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:21 am
”See Goddard v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:19 pm
Accordingly, we reverse the order of the Superior Court, and remand to the trial court with instructions to grant Appellants’ motion to dismiss B.C. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:32 am
The trial court granted summary judgment for the employer on the ground that the employee was not acting in the scope of her employment at the time of the accident. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 3:46 am
The district court granted class action certification and agreed that Washington law governs the lawsuits. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 4:19 pm
Ogle sued and the trial court granted summary judgment for the School. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 8:08 am
Kelly v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 11:57 pm
Superior Court (Plascencia) (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 409, 418, 430, quoting H&S Code section 11469, subd. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:45 am
The superior court granted Cohen’s motion for summary judgment, concluding that the public safety officer’s rule shielded Cohen from liability. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:03 pm
Turner v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 6:32 am
Holder and Lusardi v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 8:47 pm
” The California Supreme Court was quick to act in response to the Viking decision, and in August 2022, granted review of Adolph v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
Cook v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:38 am
The claim was filed before the courts in Scotland, where inspection orders were sought by the Appellants and granted by the Courts. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:45 am
[…]” (emphasis added)The Superior Court of Los Angeles County held (BC667011) that, because Feud tried to portray de Havilland as realistically as possible, it was not ‘transformative’ and therefore not eligible for protection under the First Amendment to the US Constitution.The decision was appealed to Court of Appeal of the State of California - Second Appellate District, which yesterday decidedto reverse the lower court’s… [read post]
1 May 2019, 9:30 am
On the statute of limitations issue related to the Florida State undergraduate studies, the Superior Court quotes language from a 2006 case, Crispo v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 9:30 am
On the statute of limitations issue related to the Florida State undergraduate studies, the Superior Court quotes language from a 2006 case, Crispo v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am
Superior Court, alleging that Simberg’s and Steyn’s commentary defamed him. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 8:59 am
Superior Court, 145 Cal. [read post]
