Search for: "Husband v. Wife" Results 4161 - 4180 of 6,702
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2007, 1:50 am
" A recent case from the Tax Court, Goode-Parker v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 5:52 am
  As part of the matter, the Wife even went so far as to make a claim for damages against the Husband based on an allegation of malicious prosecution, which was dismissed by the trial court and affirmed on appeal. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 8:53 am
Ct Nassau Co. 2009), the court held that a husband’s refusal to have sex with his wife three times within a year was enough to grant the wife divorce on the grounds of constructive abandonment. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 8:27 pm
  Ultimately, the matter was remanded to the trial court so that it could determine an amount to impute to the wife as her support for the third party, which would then be utilized to reduce the ex-husband's alimony payments. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:09 am by Michael C. Dorf
Now insofar as that language precludes a "husband and husband" or a "wife and wife" from filing jointly, it's invalid under Obergefell and United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 3:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
A Michigan appellate court correctly enforces a Muslim couple's "mahr" agreement, entered at the time of the couple's marriage and calling for the husband to pay certain funds to the wife -- it's a valid contract, enforceable under secular law, regardless of its religious motivation.From Ali v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:34 pm by admin
King, 1991, 804 P.2d 1235 “Husband’s request that trial court obtain investigative report on allegations of child abuse by wife was untimely, where husband did not request investigation until after court had decided case and awarded child custody to wife. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 11:29 am by Sandy T. Fox
The wife’s effort in this case was, in the court’s view, similar to another South Florida alimony case, Green v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
No, (probably) said the Appellate Division, First Department, in its April 6, 2017 decision in Keller-Goldman v. [read post]