Search for: "MUSIC v. STATE"
Results 4161 - 4180
of 4,608
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2008, 10:24 am
§ 512(c)(3)(A)(v). [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 2:58 am
Lenz v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Davis On Remand from the United States Supreme Court 08a0290p.06 2008/08/13 Beuke v. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 3:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:56 pm
Having the state Supreme Court agree to take up the matter is a victory of a sort, I guess, but is kind of like standing in the charred, smoking remains of your burned-up house and finding that the box with your award ribbons from sixth grade music camp made it unharmed. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 11:56 am
Having the state Supreme Court agree to take up the matter is a victory of a sort, I guess, but is kind of like standing in the charred, smoking remains of your burned-up house and finding that the box with your award ribbons from sixth grade music camp made it unharmed. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:19 am
See Elektra v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 11:35 pm
In Jacobsen v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:45 pm
I was trying to do just that in UMG v. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 7:59 am
A silver medal goes to Michael's post on DeJohn v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 4:16 am
The Order states that the principal reason for the extension was the very recent decision of the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in the case Cartoon Network v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
: (Patenting Lives), Worldwide increase in patent filings puts strain on system: (Managing Intellectual Property), WIPO releases 2008 Worldwide Patent Report: (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Patent Prospector), (IP Updates), Global patent filings continue rise but may level off; smaller nationals slipping: (Intellectual Property Watch), Means plus function: Don’t ignore the man behind the curtain: (Intellectual Property Directions), Technology start-up entrepreneurs and CEOs: If your… [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Giovanniello v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 9:55 pm
" State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 4:13 pm
This can no longer be allowed in view of the comments in Bovemij Verzekeringen NV v Benelux Merkenbureau, Case C-108/05 [EUROPOLIS], which makes clear that the mark must be distinctive in the whole of the territory of the member state [Merpel would like a little clarification here: is this what Bovemij clearly established?]. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 1:37 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 1:01 am
" After all, with Fonovisa v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 1:29 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 10:18 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
