Search for: "Mark I. Congress"
Results 4161 - 4180
of 7,022
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2013, 2:35 pm
And I rarely get to end on a positive note, so I relish the times when I can: Carlotta Gall of the Times reports that uprisings against the Taliban have spread to dozens of villages in Afghanistan since early February. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
So I looked closer at Sen. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
Euro-Excellence, which involved copyright in a small logo on the packaging of Toblerone chocolate bars (I should disclose that I made the prevailing argument on behalf of an intervener, the Retail Council of Canada, in that case). [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
Euro-Excellence, which involved copyright in a small logo on the packaging of Toblerone chocolate bars (I should disclose that I made the prevailing argument on behalf of an intervener, the Retail Council of Canada, in that case). [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 1:04 pm
It is not clear whether this was what Congress intended and there is obviously friction between the first sale doctrine and the distribution right.In the end, for readers of this blog, I suspect the decision will have limited impact. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:58 am
Australian Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus has opened the Sixth World Congress on Family Law and Children’s Rights in Sydney today. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 11:35 am
Justice Department event marking the 50th anniversary of the high court's landmark Gideon v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:58 am
Congress, the President, Courts) is authorized to do the suspending. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 10:19 am
I’m going crazy and I’m getting out of here. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 12:31 pm
What if you listed three boxes without a check mark? [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 10:58 am
However, Congress has declined to create common carrier obligations. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 5:53 am
Department of Labor marked the birthday by, among other things, issuing a new final rule implementing two expansions of FMLA protections enacted by Congress. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm
Mark your calendars. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
The problem of allowing implicitly false misrepresentations of compliance with law is that it would “permit private enforcement of government standards when Congress has not provided a private cause of action and has instead entrusted enforcement to the relevant public agency,” but that problem doesn’t exist when the standards aren’t set or enforced by the government. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 6:50 am
If we were to spend what we took in (I know that’s a crazy concept and one that hasn’t quite caught up to Congress), we’d have a balanced budget. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 11:03 am
I’ll leave it to others to point out that seeing only costs in the AUMF, and refusing to consider the opportunity costs of its repeal, is not a mark of seriousness. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
In most cases, the instructions indicate that fields that do not apply to an employee (or where employees choose not to provide optional information) should be marked “N/A. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 6:13 am
Well, as soon as I sign this bill that ends,” said President Barack Obama, moments before signing the bill. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:14 pm
Perhaps the strongest one is the federal statute first enacted by Congress in 1793, known as the "Anti-Injunction Act", now codified as 28 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 9:06 am
When I asked him how often the government empirically needed such extensions, he said that very few if any required secrecy past the one-year mark, by which time usually investigations had been closed and arrests, if any, had been made.Judge Smith expressed concern that, if and when Congress does address the issue, they'll do so based on excruciatingly little empirical data. [read post]
