Search for: "People v. Profit"
Results 4161 - 4180
of 4,430
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2008, 8:37 am
There follows a statement that no High Court judge has published memoirs before retiring and another statement “the most important thing about judges is they must prove to be people who can exercise judgment. [read post]
13 May 2008, 5:04 pm
The state argues that the "grossly repugnant" video games are not worthy of First Amendment protection because they do not communicate or express ideas or information.For more information, please see: Entertainment Software Association et al. v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 4:23 pm
They are basically using the same argument under which a right to privacy was found under Roe v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 7:48 am
If a liberal legal academic cannot say publicly (if she believes it to be so) that Roe v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 12:01 am
And, of course, the Senator's speech does share one quality with Cooper Union, Gettysburg, the FDR Inaugural, Henry V at Agincourt, Socrates's Apology, etc: It's history. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 9:33 pm
Lemerond v. 20th Century Fox, No. 07-4635, 2008 WL 918579 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 3:36 pm
That is an adage, the Court said then in Reynolds v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 11:09 am
* Wilson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 10:32 am
She writes: Unless Congress intervenes, companies will be able to discriminate for years and unjustly profit from paying women, minorities, the elderly, and people with disabilities less, as long as it keeps the discrimination secret for a few months. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
Consolidation. 20 years ago the AmLaw 50 accounted for about 6% of all private, for-profit law firm revenue in the US. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Ranbaxy and AstraZeneca reach agreement in Esomeprazole patent litigation: (SmartBrief), (IPBiz), (Spicy IP), (Profitability through Simplicity), (IP Law360), (Philip Brooks), (GenericsWeb), Cadbury loses Australian battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks… [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:13 am
” (page 4, Riegel v. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 1:58 am
Imig, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 8:13 am
Coverage of the Baze v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 3:45 am
Coverage of the Baze v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:29 am
Instead, the authors say, throwing people in jail is simply "saddling cash-strapped states with soaring costs they can ill afford and failing to have a clear impact either on recidivism or overall crime. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 12:23 pm
- Ticketmaster Corp. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 7:51 pm
A classic depiction of the shareholder-primacy principle can be found in the case of Dodge v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
[i] They do not provide lawyers for poor people involved in civil cases. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 11:41 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari today in the "Fantasy Baseball" case of CBC Distribution v. [read post]
