Search for: "Perry"
Results 4161 - 4180
of 12,156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2013, 5:19 am
Perry and then drew straws to see which five would be in the majority and which four in the dissent. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:48 pm
In LA or Alameda, they probably could use the Perry injunction for preclusive effect; in other counties, the couple could use it as persuasive authority. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:19 pm
Not if you're Rick Perry, of course. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:58 pm
Perry today, the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:41 pm
Perry (the Prop 8 case) here. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:23 pm
Perry this morning (see Marriage Equality Returns to California), California is included among those states. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:18 pm
Perry, 570 U.S. ___ (2013), this morning, regarding the validity of Proposition 8. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm
They are-Hollingsworth v Perry (rejecting an appeal of the lower court decision overturning California's Proposition 8, on technical jurisdictional grounds), and US v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 4:35 pm
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 4:32 pm
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:27 pm
Perry, 570 U. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:18 pm
Perry, John Roberts, LGBT, Marriage, Maryland v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:08 pm
Perry. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
Perry (Prop 8) case, assuming that the Court first saw its way clear to finding standing on the part of the official proponents of Prop 8. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:25 pm
Turning to Perry, what should one make of the decision to avoid the merits altogether? [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:16 pm
Kennedy charmingly referred to his dissent in Perry twice as being respectfully offered, no doubt out of some awareness of the fragility of coalitions in that case. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
In Perry, the Court ruled that only the state had standing to defend the law. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:37 pm
Three of the liberals joined Chief Justice Roberts in Perry (Breyer, Ginsburg, and Kagan). [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:30 pm
Perry, the Court dismissed due to a lack of jurisdiction over the appeal. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:30 pm
Perry, the Court dismissed due to a lack of jurisdiction over the appeal. [read post]
