Search for: "Root v. State"
Results 4161 - 4180
of 4,649
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2010, 4:29 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 12:30 pm
Both approaches are rooted in the unique history of the American people. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 9:36 am
At the moment, the law across Europe about how to decide what is and is not patentable is not settled, even though the same law should effectively apply in all member states of the EPC (comprising all 27 EU states together with a few other non-EU states). [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 6:10 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:00 am
Aurobindo Pharma Limited (Patentcircle) India/US: Indian pharma sector ‘fares well’ in US disputes (PatLit) India: The woes of the grassroot innovator in the agricultural sector (Spicy IP) South Africa: Biopiracy in Alice – Schwabe Pharamaceuticals wishes to patent method for extracting active ingredient in cough medicine from pelargonium roots (Afro-IP) UK: Okay to split costs where actions are joined, says Court of Appeal: Actavis UK Ltd v Eli Lilly & Co Ltd… [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 3:14 pm
In today’s case (Smusz v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Supreme Court, January 20, 2010 Wood v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Supreme Court, January 20, 2010 Wood v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm
State of Florida, No. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm
State of Florida, No. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:19 pm
The first part, 32 National Reports, is an overview of the existing legal and administrative practices in the Member States, EEA countries and Candidate Countries, with regard to the treatment of electronic documents in e-Commerce transactions. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 4:57 pm
In other words, while virtuous citizens are developed by smaller institutions with roots in the local community, the corporation still can act as a vital counter-vailing force against the state. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:13 pm
The legislative history states: "Subparagraph (A) is intended to codify current case law e. g., Neal v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:49 am
If the mouse weighs heavily in your hand and you can't be bothered to click, but just want to know the question, this is it: "Are non-Community goods bearing a Community trade mark which are subject to customs supervision in a Member State and in transit from a non-Member State to another non-Member State capable of constituting "counterfeit goods" within the meaning of Article 2(1)(a) of Regulation 1383/2003/EC if there is no evidence to suggest that… [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 7:59 am
As a collection attorney, I was rooting for Mr. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 7:59 am
As a collection attorney, I was rooting for Mr. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 4:31 am
The question in Malloy v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 5:32 pm
All state laws vary. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:35 pm
Texas v. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 8:45 am
Recently, the Supreme Court clarified the concept of bad faith in Lyondell Chemical Co. v. [read post]
