Search for: "Small v. People"
Results 4161 - 4180
of 8,533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2015, 7:05 am
You’d need a “small UAS,” which is an unmanned aircraft weighing less than 55 pounds. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:30 pm
Different people may well have different takes on this. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:50 am
Justice Scalia himself wrote, in Mistretta, that: a certain degree of discretion, and thus of lawmaking, inheres in most . . . judicial action, and it is up to Congress, by the relative specificity or generality of its statutory commands, to determine—up to a point—how small or how large that degree shall be. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 9:15 am
Janes v. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 10:58 am
[5, 33] Aerosolized vomit has also been implicated as a mode of norovirus transmission. [24] Previously, it was thought that viral shedding ceased approximately 100 hours after infection; however, some individuals continue to shed norovirus long after they have recovered from it, in some cases up to 28 days after experiencing symptoms. [28, 31, 35] Viral shedding can also precede symptoms, which occurs in approximately 30% of cases. [16] Often, an infected food handler may not even show… [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:35 am
Some cases, like D’Oench, Duhme & Co. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 12:45 pm
Supreme Court Justice Harlan’s concurring opinion in Katz v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 11:30 am
As the court in Potts v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 5:15 pm
Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]
22 Aug 2015, 8:25 am
DatabaseLLC * Damages from Competitive Keyword Advertising Are “Vanishingly Small” * More Defendants Win Keyword Advertising Lawsuits * Another Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Fails Badly * Duplicitous Competitive Keyword Advertising Lawsuits–Fareportal v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:07 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:24 am
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:59 am
The court held that, under California law (see, e.g., County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:23 pm
Anheuser-Busch, LLC v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 7:21 am
Many elderly people are injured in back over accidents as well. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 3:05 pm
” Ultimately, as Boaz notes, Trump and the CRDA lost in court in CRDA v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
In his recent decision in the case of Reilly v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
In Powell v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 3:22 am
Anheuser-Busch, LLC v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
She reasoned that an exception, such as for individuals aged between 18 and 25 who have spent half their lives living continuously in the UK (based on the para. 276ADE(v) of the Immigration Rules, relating to entitlement to leave based on private life), might reasonably be added or an exceptional cases discretionary created given the comparatively small numbers likely to be eligible under the exception. [read post]
