Search for: "State v. Branch"
Results 4161 - 4180
of 7,022
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2023, 3:46 am
” Part V will respond to recent academic arguments suggesting that the President is an “officer of the United States” for purposes of Section 3. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:18 am
By their decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
24 May 2025, 3:49 am
In Michaelson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 11:01 am
But we live in an era in which Presidents and the executive branch turn increasingly to the administrative state to implement priorities that they cannot enact through Congress. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 7:33 pm
Ohio; Cox v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 7:10 am
Monday the Court called for the views of the Solicitor General in Carmichael v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:43 am
We found the decision in Mills v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 5:00 am
The law would meet the other requirements of South Dakota v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 2:49 pm
The answer is no, for reasons explained by Justice Alito in his four-member dissent in Kennedy v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:30 pm
The case decided today, Jesner v. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 10:44 am
Of course, these are all acts of the legislative branch, not the Executive Branch. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 3:50 pm
” Thomas praised Justice John Marshall Harlan’s sole dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 12:41 pm
V, §16. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:25 pm
Under the [governing statute], a state-court decision can be set aside on federal habeas review only if it is "contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 11:38 am
In FAIR v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 8:04 am
Meyer v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm
Like the earlier cases, this one, Reynolds v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 6:09 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:07 pm
United States, 20-1410, and Kahn v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 4:04 pm
United States, each of the separate opinions contended that the 16th Amendment (ratified in 1913) "overruled" Pollock v. [read post]
