Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 4161 - 4180
of 15,305
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2019, 9:27 am
[I should note I think the Office is completely right in saying (1) §43(a)(1)(B) claims should survive Dastarwhere false attributions are material to consumers and (2) Dastar applies to in-copyright works as well. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:27 am
That's why I stated— The Court: So, it is of record, then. [read post]
14 May 2019, 2:55 am
In other words, the bill would shift onto the State’s private sector employers the obligation to subsidize the State’s pension funds without actually increasing the compensation of disabled public safety workers. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:51 am
Co v. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am
See Robert B. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:07 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:37 am
There is no mention whether the contract was governed by Texas law or some other state's law. [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:38 am
As we stated in Kelly [Kelly v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:35 am
Por su parte, el joven Jean C. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:30 am
United States v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 8:44 am
§ 1225(b)(2)(C)—that allows immigration officials to return certain new entrants to a country that is “contiguous” to (i.e., bordering on) the United States while those foreign nationals await a full hearing before an immigration judge. [read post]
8 May 2019, 8:31 pm
State (Ga. 1991), in a case involving a man who was displaying a "Shit Happens" sticker; that's not quite the same issue as here, though. [read post]
8 May 2019, 4:56 pm
C. [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:21 am
With respect to passing off, the plaintiff must establish: (a) reputation of the goods; (b) possibility of deception of the consumer; and (c) likelihood of loss. [read post]
7 May 2019, 11:56 am
Last year, the California Supreme Court decided Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 8:27 am
A recent Court of Appeals decision, State v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:42 pm
In the case at issue, Dynamex Operations West v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 8:51 am
To the shock of employers, on May 2, 2019, a unanimous three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals (the Panel), in Vasquez v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:14 am
Sebastiampillai v Parr. [read post]
6 May 2019, 3:52 am
Chicago Cubs Baseball Club, LLC v. [read post]
