Search for: "State v. Franks"
Results 4161 - 4180
of 4,353
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:49 am
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Gonzalez v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm
”[v]The release does not explain what such a response would entail, which is not surprising given that the SEC is neither equipped nor authorized to tell private funds how to manage their risks, let alone to rescue private funds in times of stress. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Eddington (Senior Fellow, Cato Institute)“Lessons Learned and Caveats for the Future: The January 6, 2021, Attempted Insurrection”Expert Statement Mary Anne Franks (Professor of Law and Michael R. [read post]
Do We Finally Have a Canadian Re:Sound Copyright “Fitness Tariff” After 8 Years? “Are We There Yet”?
1 Jun 2015, 3:07 pm
In its July 6, 2012 decision in this case from 2012, it said with uncharacteristic frankness:[112] The quantum proposed by Re:Sound, $86million, is at least five times as much as whatRe:Sound receives from commercial radiostations. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 4:30 am
It is a criminal case called U.S. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:47 am
Frank W. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 2:24 pm
One of the earliest examples is Hahn v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 9:24 am
One of the earliest examples is Hahn v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am
http://bit.ly/QeYSVx (Michael Schmidt) Proper Wildcard Searching: Why You Should Give a Dam* – http://bit.ly/Pjc34V (Doug Austin) Radically Reinvent The Review Process - http://bit.ly/Q2x6LK (George Kiersted) Rambus ‘Shred Days’ Ruled Spoliation, $397M Judgment Reduced - http://bit.ly/Pn446U (Jan Wolfe) Reasonable Particularity And Social Network eDiscovery - http://bit.ly/P0Kqxr (IT-Lex) State Judge Imposes $300K… [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 10:35 am
See Allergan Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 2:19 am
The funds obtained through the enforcement in the relevant EU Member State shall therefore invariably be paid to the relevant State treasury in Germany. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:05 am
Our prediction of winners: 1-1, against the spread 1-1ThursdayKentucky v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
”[19]The Interpretive Guidance states that the Council expects to “continue addressing most risks through its collaboration with primary financial regulators” and will base any nonbank financial company designation on “data-driven analysis that reflects the distinctive aspects of the company, its market, and its existing regulation. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm
In fact, many of the challenges and the conundrums presented by Section 404 rules were not fully appreciated until those issues surfaced again in subsequent statutes, such as the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 and the JOBS Act of 2012. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Today, Columbia is honoring Jack Coffee, a leader of securities law scholarship and policy. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:41 am
Petitioners also state that separate "insurance cards" are necessary. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:01 am
Recent examples include the State of Georgia’s litigation to stop Carl Malamud and Public.Resource.Org from publishing the Official Code of Georgia Annotated in the United States (Georgia et al. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm
Some state laws on this may also have to be addressed.Why are 11 of 26 biosimilars approved not actively marketed in the US? [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm
Magistrate Judge Frank Maas. [read post]
