Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 4161 - 4180 of 8,247
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2014, 4:02 am by John Enser
This morning the CJEU (second chamber) handed down judgement in case C-98/13, Martin Blomqvist v Rolex SA,Manufacture des Montres Rolex SAThe point at issue before the CJEU (set out in a series of questions which the court condensed to a single answer) was that, in the scenario where somebody purchased from a non-EU website counterfeit goods (in this case, a fake Rolex), could these be seized by customs, it being apparently common ground that the Customs Regulation required… [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:41 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
The petition of the day is: Moreno v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 5:12 pm by Lyle Denniston
Holder (12-1401), which is a test of whether gun fanciers have a right to sue to challenge federal gun laws that restrict their option of buying guns from dealers in a different state. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:56 am
While this Kat was taking part to the outstanding EIPIN congress in Alicante, he became aware of the fresh decision by the Madrid Court of Appeal in YouTube v Telecinco of 14 January 2014 [Madrid Court of Appeal decision No 11/2014, available here; non-official English translation kindly provided by the Kat-friend Carolina Pina (Garrigues Madrid) available here; the IPKat's note on the first instance decision here]. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:55 am by Yishai Schwartz
And Wells linked to a District Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:00 am by Brent Lorentz
  Writing for the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, Judge Posner explained in Flava Works, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:04 pm by Jane Chong
Holder, Jr. authorized the government to seek the death penalty in the case of United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 5:15 am by David Markus
Holder—Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
Yesterday, I wrote about the doctrine that “state action” is immune from federal antitrust law, a doctrine that dates back to the Parker v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:40 am
This morning Advocate General Cruz Villalón delivered his Opinion in Case C‑583/12 Sintax Trading OÜ v Maksu- ja Tolliameti Põhja maksu- ja tollikeskus, a request to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus, Estonia. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:22 am
The Court found Congress's purpose in enacting the NSPA was to `assist the States' efforts to foil the “roving criminal,” whose movement across state lines. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:54 am by Florian Mueller
While the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit gave every indication at a December hearing that the grossly erroneous non-copyrightability holding in Oracle v. [read post]