Search for: "State v. Price" Results 4161 - 4180 of 13,213
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2017, 12:11 am
A few days ago the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued the much-awaited decision Coty Germany GmbH v Parfümerie Akzente GmbH, C-230/16. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 8:06 am by Joy Waltemath
The mutable/immutable distinction set forth in Willingham was invalidated by the Supreme Court in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Last week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
105 S.Ct. 2218 85 L.Ed.2d 588 HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC. and the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Petitionersv.NATION ENTERPRISES and the Nation Associates, Inc. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 8:01 am by David Markus
By resting its decision on Willingham’s mutable/immutable distinction, the panel revives—in fact, expands—a doctrine the Supreme Court invalidated more than twenty-five years ago in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Ralph Oman, Dechert, Price & Rhoads, Washington, D.C., as amicus. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 2:27 am by Keith Mallinson
The new US Department of Justice antitrust leader says antitrust enforcers are too accommodating to IP implementers when in dispute with standard-essential patent owners. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 5:13 am by David Fraser
Indeed, the use of data for historical statistics of selling prices necessitates that the data will be kept. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 5:13 am by privacylawyer
Indeed, the use of data for historical statistics of selling prices necessitates that the data will be kept. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:00 pm by John Chierichella and Adam Bartolanzo
The statute expressly stated that submission of cost or pricing data shall not be required. [read post]
He states that a “very senior member of the Presidential Transition Team,” a “senior [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:39 pm by Amy Howe
The power district moved to dismiss the case, arguing that it cannot be sued under federal antitrust law because Arizona law gives it the authority to set prices – a doctrine known as “state-action immunity. [read post]