Search for: "State v. Sample" Results 4161 - 4180 of 4,544
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2009, 11:23 am
Such a non-categorical approach was recently used by the 9th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 12:35 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKTortsAirline Workers' Suit Over Drug Test Lab's False Report of Substitute Samples Partly DismissedSiotkas v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 1:34 am
Smith was asked to voluntarily give a DNA sample, when he refused, the State obtained a warrant. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 4:10 am
S 59 Last Act: 01/07/09 referred to ways and meansA160 Budget -- Enacts into law major components of legislation which are necessary to implement the state fiscal plan for the 2009-2010 state fiscal year Same as Uni. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 3:48 am
S 58 BLURB : Budgbi HMH Art. vii Last Act: 01/07/09 referred to ways and meansA160 Budget -- Enacts into law major components of legislation which are necessary to implement the state fiscal plan for the 2009-2010 state fiscal year Same as Uni. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
Wellcome then asked that, in future, Paranova inform its related company Glaxo of the details of its marketing activities, attaching a complete sample of every type of packaging and disclosing the state of export and the exact reasons for the repackaging. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Additionally, the state health officer (a physician) made a statement directed at consumers and retailers (restaurants, grocery stores): “I hope you will purchase irradiated chicken and ground beef as they become available. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:43 pm by Richard D. Friedman
The certificate cannot be admitted consistently with the Confrontation Clause unless a witness with personal knowledge – presumably but not necessarily the author of the certificate – testifies to both propositions.A recent opinion usefully summarizing the decisions on this matter, and coming to the proper result, is United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 2:52 am
 Specifically, on December 4, the ECHR issued its decision, S. and Marper v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:12 am
In DUI case, majority concludes that machine-generated data concerning positive test in a blood sample was not a statement of the lab technicians and therefore was not a hearsay statement, since it was not made by a person but a machine analyzing the sample; no Confrontation Clause issues were raised, in United States v. [read post]