Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 4161 - 4180 of 4,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2010, 10:50 am by Venkat
[Post by Venkat, with additional comments from Eric below] Snap-on Business Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:01 pm
” is typical of its output: last month’s ruling on human gene patents in Association for Molecular Pathology v US Patent & Trademark Office was picked up by many blogs, but never like this.Blogs come, blogs go. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 5:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Commercial Alert also complained about stealth/buzz marketing, where consumers are paid to talk up products. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 5:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
We wouldn’t get involved in the science, ex post v. ex ante and that sort of thing. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 3:22 am by John Hochfelder
Penzo said he hadn’t consumed any alcohol that night as his probation restrictions prohibited him from drinking. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 9:29 am by Andrew Russell
Sadly, it is the American consumer who ultimately ends up the real loser in these advertising wars. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Q: doesn’t the lack of complaint show that a reasonable consumer isn’t being misled? [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 7:10 pm by David
Wrath is consuming and destructive. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This is bound up with rules v. standards. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
He finds First Amendment invocations mystical; prefers the Mastercard v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:30 am by Venkat
[Correction: it looks like Peacefire is pursuing a claim under the Washington spam statute as well as a claim under Washington's consumer protection statute. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sometimes consumers don’t care about search costs/like them. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm by Adam Thierer
  “Nudging” consumers towards better media choices isn’t based on clear science about, say, eating better or getting more exercise, but on highly subjective decisions about what kind of information consumption is really good for individuals, communities, and polities. [read post]