Search for: "True v True" Results 4161 - 4180 of 33,930
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2008, 12:40 pm
[IPKat question: is this true of Art.5(2) infringement as well?] [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 5:24 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 609(a) provides that The following rules apply to attacking a witness’s character for truthfulness by evidence of a criminal conviction: (1) for a crime that, in the convicting jurisdiction, was punishable by death or by imprisonment... [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 7:00 pm
Eric, perhaps your reference to the EPA is a veiled reference to Massachusetts v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 6:32 pm by Joe Mullin
However, some members of the patent bar see Section 101 as an overly blunt tool for weeding out bad patents from true innovations. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 9:58 am by Ernest E. Badway
  This case is of particular interest to securities litigators because it is one of several cases since the landmark Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm by INFORRM
  In all other respects Flood upheld and applied the principles set out by the House of Lords in Reynolds v The Times and Jameel v Wall Street Journal. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:32 pm
  In particular, Judge Tashima examines at the studies that plaintiff cites and says that they don't "really" establish that eating Pop Secret's trans fat every month or two causes any physical harm.But, first, I'm not certain that's true. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 11:42 am
 So, in theory, the cable companies don't have a monopoly, and hence are subject to competitive pressures.But if that's really true, then why do we see the world as it is? [read post]