Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK" Results 4161 - 4180 of 7,223
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2024, 12:59 pm by Holly
A patent infringement action under Section 337 requires a complainant to prove that: (1) products are being imported into the United States that “infringe a valid and enforceable United States patent,”[9] and (2) “an industry in the United States, relating to the articles protected by the patent . . . exists or is in the process of being established. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 11:28 am by Rachel Sandler
Today’s en banc decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Aqua Products, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 9:39 am by Eric Goldman
How Cedar Valley was able to persuade the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) to register such marks is a mystery, particularly given that Cedar Valley has used only particular shades of orange; used it only on shirts, lawn signs, and a few other advertising items; and used it only in connection with a narrow slice of the construction industry. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 4:27 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Beléndez-Ferrero supervises the federal and Puerto Rico trademark registrations, actively participating in opposition and trademark proceedings both before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in the United States Patent and Trademark Office and also in the Puerto Rico State Department. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:45 am by ipelton
Amidst all this activity, the firm registered its 1,500th client trademark overall with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 11:42 am by Jeremy Malcolm
For example, the United States has restrictive laws on the circumvention of DRM; laws that don't exist (or exist with broader exceptions) in other countries such as Israel and India. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:20 am by Jani Ihalainen
One still has to appreciate that the copyright holder can at any time reassert their rights, and thus the copyright in the works is newly resurrected (although, as evident from the above, was never gone to begin with).Our cousins in the United States do accept the abandonment of copyrights in works. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 9:32 pm
Assuming they made sales in United States commerce before July 1999, The Clinic (UK) at least would have common law rights to their name here. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 3:03 am
Notice of Data Security Incident Dear valued customer, The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently identified a data security incident that impacted domicile information in certain trademark filings between February 2020 and March 2023. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 12:43 pm by Mike Mireles
Prometheus decisions by the United States Patent and Trademark Office and some judges of the U.S. [read post]
3 May 2012, 9:33 am by European Patent Office
China, Japan and the United States accounted for 82% of the total growth, and the Chinese telecommunications company ZTE Corporation was the largest filer of PCT applications in 2011. 2011 also saw the highest number of international trademark applications ever filed under WIPO’s Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks (“Madrid system”) with 42,270 applications, or a 6.5 % increase... [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 10:07 am by Jo Dale Carothers
”) entitled, “Devices and Methods for Attracting Enhanced Attention” with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  InGen’s website has a Q&A column “acknowledging that [Defendant] InGen's services would amount to patent infringement if offered in the United States, Canada and/or European Union,” and InGen advertised in the US and offered the service to US customers, who made up approximately 80-85% of its customer base. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:13 am by Andres
All of the above is compounded by the fact that recently the Roslin Institute lost a 10 year legal battle in the United States to patent the result of cloning. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 3:33 pm by Nikki Siesel
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit declared in part: “the board’s requirement that the registrant-opposer also be a prior user impermissively negates the statutory distinction (“or”) in Section 2(d) between a registered mark and a previously-used-but-unregistered mark, would permit simultaneous registration of the same mark for the same goods to different parties, and disregards–in effect conflicts with–Patent… [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 10:52 am by James Gatto
However, a foreign filing license from the USPTO does not authorize the exporting of subject matter abroad for the preparation of patent applications to be filed in the United States. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 8:43 am by Dennis Crouch
Consent Order vs Exclusion Order:  At the ITC, Swagway had proposed a consent order that it “would not sell for importation, import, or sell after importation into the United States products sold under the SWAGWAY mark. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 8:42 am by Keith Mallinson
[1] United States Government National Standards Strategy for Critical and Emerging Technology, May 4, 2023 [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 3:25 pm by Gene Quinn
President Obama Calls USPTO Filing System “Embarrassing”ShareTweetEarlier today President Barack Obama, perhaps with the best of intentions, demonstrated that he is not all that familiar with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and how they handle patent applications. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:34 pm
Known as the “Dog Ate My Homework Act”, Section 4 of the bill involves a grant of authority to the Director or the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to excuse specific late filingsâ€â [read post]