Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 4161 - 4180
of 6,293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2010, 8:30 am
Moore v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 1:33 pm
In so determining, the district court looked to other evidence that was the basis of other child pornography charges to determine the defendant's sexual proclivities.The question presented is whether or not extrensic evidence of other photographs helps determine if one of the United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 8:48 am
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2025, 2:57 pm
One of those cases was United States v. [read post]
19 May 2025, 2:14 pm
Lozano-Camargo is a member of a class of unaccompanied minors covered by a December 2025 settlement agreement prohibiting their removal from the United States while they have an asylum application pending. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am
United States, 14-29, have now been rescheduled three times. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:16 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:27 am
In the courts Jean PEARSON v the United Kingdom – 40957/07 [2011] ECHR 2319 (13 December 2011). [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:30 am
United States left in lingering doubt just how far Congress may go to pass a law to implement a world treaty. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
Barber: The court overruled State v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:06 am
In the 6-3 majority decision, Justice Lewis Powell said Massachusetts couldn’t jail a man for wearing small cloth version of the United States flag sewn to the seat of his jeans. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
The state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 11:09 am
Alternatively, if we find that Plaza's use was nonconforming at the time the ordinances were enacted, Plaza urges us to find the sexually oriented business ordinances unconstitutional pursuant to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm
Because American Indians are “members of quasi-sovereign tribal entities” and not merely part of a “discrete racial group,” they retain unique federal protections compared to other racial minorities in the United States. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 1:59 pm
United States, 303 F.2d 366, 368 (3rd Cir., 1962) (“the date of the original return governs”); Mabel Elevator Co. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:33 pm
EMA, concerning a ban on the sale of violent video games to minors; and Snyder v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In the states, we have had a viral contagion of state RFRA amendments that would make it possible for businesses to defend refusals to do business with homosexuals and/or same-sex couples (and in Arizona, with women, minorities, and the disabled, among others). [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 6:32 am
Dvoretzky reiterated throughout his argument that “the United States has told us” the FDA “understood [Merck’s proposed] warning” to be about atypical femoral fractures. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 8:12 am
Professor Andrew Morriss suggests that we may have seen this dynamic in action in the Alabama legislature's response to LePage v. [read post]
