Search for: "United States v. Small"
Results 4161 - 4180
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2014, 12:26 am
It told the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that it had "conferred with Appellee International Trade Commission and Intervenor Apple Inc., and neither party object[ed] to the requested voluntary dismissal. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
Pa. 2012); Steele v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:38 pm
United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 6:07 am
At no time was the United States Government or any federal official a party to any action.The particular proceeding that came to the Supreme Court as Medellin v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 12:16 am
On Tuesday morning during Oral Questions in the Commons, the Secretary of State for Justice said this in reply to a supplementary question from Martin Docherty-Hughes (West Dunbartonshire, SNP): “We have made it clear that we would not rule out ever withdrawing from the ECHR in the future”. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:01 am
One of the federal contractors has stated that it is confident the contribution was legal under Citizens United, another plans to ask for its donation back, and the commission appears to be split on the issue. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:45 pm
” (Brief at p. 8)Of these, 1 and 2 are doing all the work, since 3 can be satisfied by any limitation at all on federal power – and as I and others have noted, that limitation is already provided by United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:35 am
-Alabama v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am
Diamond Innovations Inc (EDTexweblog.com) (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania will revisit and reconsider the standing issue in false marking case: United States of America ex rel FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:52 am
Looking to Strasbourg jurisprudence, he commented, “[t]he ECtHR will only find that the state has acted in violation of A1P1” if its judgment is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” (James v United Kingdom (1986) 8 EHRR 123). [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
§ 145, which provides: An applicant dissatisfied with the decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board…may, unless appeal has been taken to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, have remedy by civil action against the Director in the United States District Court….The court may adjudge that such applicant is entitled to receive a patent for his invention….All the expenses of the proceedings… [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
United States, are also the top two cases generating the most interest so far this term. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am
Gambling machines STATE OF TEXAS v. $1,760.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 37 "8" LINER MACHINES, No. 12-0718 Per Curiam The Court agreed with the State that certain “eight-liner” machines qualified as gambling equipment for purposes of civil forfeiture. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
For instance, with respect to the $32.2 billion in security assistance the United States has provided Ukraine since February 24, 2022, Hague Convention XIII unequivocally states “the supply, in any manner, directly or indirectly, by a neutral Power to a belligerent Power, of war-ships, ammunition, or war material of any kind whatever, is forbidden” (art. 6). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:30 pm
Wilcox- Precon Development Corporation v. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 10:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 8:03 am
And, in any event, it contended that the Supreme Court settled the issue against this kind of challenge in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:51 am
” Judge Miller cited United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:01 am
It is telling that the citations in the footnote to my quoted sentence were to a legal scholar that Justice Thomas also quoted in the same opinion that tends to agree with his view of federal power in Indian affairs, Sai Prakash, and to a Supreme Court opinion that Justice Thomas is rallying against, the lead opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:22 pm
Relation of this Final Rule to the July 2, 2009, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking V. [read post]
