Search for: "**u.s. v. Leon" Results 401 - 420 of 723
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2017, 8:38 am by MBettman
Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984)(Evidence obtained by way of a defective search warrant is admissible at trial, so long as the warrant was obtained in good faith and the officer had reasonable grounds for believing the warrant was properly issued.) [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:41 am by Kali Borkoski
Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984), and Malley v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 10:32 am by Tom Smith
Of the 39 known or suspected human rights violators arrested during Operation No Safe Haven V, 16 individuals are also criminal aliens in the U.S. with convictions for crimes including, but not limited to, domestic violence, driving under the influence of liquor, drug distribution, firearm possession, grand theft, reckless endangerment, robbery, fraud and theft. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance Bloomberg Law had a piece “Surveillance in Spotlight Amid Ongoing EU-U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:29 pm by The LBN Team
Judge Leon's decision was based on a Supreme Court case decided in 2000 called FDA v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 8:12 am by Mark Ashton
Last month brought us the decision of the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 10:52 am by Steve Lubet
Regarding Gonzales’s first claim, we can turn again to Judge Leon Higginbotham’s opinion in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 8:02 pm by Ryan Scoville
One might argue that those soldiers were no longer U.S. citizens because they were fighting for the Confederacy, but that position is inconsistent with the view—supported by the Supreme Court’s decision in Texas v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm by John Elwood
Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984), and Malley v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:45 am by Samantha Fry
Leon fast-tracks suit for final argument. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Leon had decided to review the companies’ settlement with the Antitrust Division of the U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:13 am by Lyle Denniston
  That involves the meaning of a 1984 Supreme Court ruling in U.S. v. [read post]