Search for: "*/**thompson v. State Attorneys Office"
Results 401 - 420
of 455
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2008, 7:43 pm
State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
Buie, No. 070258 Sentence of fifteen years for being a felon in possession of a firearm is affirmed where: 1) because the maximum penalty for the offense to which defendant pleaded guilty was ten years or more under state statute, defendant's state felony narcotics conviction qualified as a "serious drug offense" under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA); and 2) defendant's allegation that he was deprived of counsel at his plea hearing did not state a… [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 5:43 pm
Thompson, 811 N.E.2d at 929. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 4:18 pm
Kaplan reached two years ago: absent the Thompson Memo (the Principles of Federal Prosecution of Business Organizations then-in-effect) and the actions of the US Attorney’s Office, KPMG would have paid the legal fees of all of its partners and employees without regard to cost. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Robinson, No. 08-10424 In a case involving the retroactive application of an amendment to the federal sentencing guidelines applying a two-level reduction for all crack offenses, defendant's request for counsel to represent him in his appeal of a motion for reconsideration of an order resentencing defendant without allowing him an attorney is granted where the interests of justice required that counsel be appointed to address the issues to be raised on appeal. . [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
State of Tennessee, No. 06-6208 In civil rights suit alleging that city police discriminated against plaintiffs in violation of the Ame [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:10 pm
Spurred by Judge Lewis Kaplan's excoriation of the government for such heavy-handed tactics and his dismissal of an indictment in the KPMG prosecution in the Southern District of New York (United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In Wilkes v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 9:34 am
Phillip V. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 2:26 pm
E.g., In re Quest Communications, Int’l, 450 F.3d 1179 (10th Cir. 2006); United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 10:30 pm
Attorney General John D. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Davis, No. 07-10177 An Anders motion to withdraw as counsel by defendant's federal public defender is denied without prejudice where: 1) counsel's Acquaye statement did not indicate that he had consulted with the United States Attorney's Office (USAO) as to defendant's case; 2) there was no indication that the USAO will enforce the appellate waiver; and 3) counsel could not simply rely on the USAO's statement that they will enforce the appeal… [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 5:08 pm
In Amanda Thompson v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, May 08, 2008 Thompson v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Moore, No. 06-1082 In a case raising the issue of whether a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment by making an arrest based on probable cause but prohibited by state law, the Supreme Court rules that warrantless arrests for crimes committed in the presence of an arresting officer are reasonable under the Constitution, and that while states are free to regulate such arrests however they desire, state restrictions do not alter the Fourth… [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 10:54 am
We affirm.Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of S.L.H.S., and Andrew Thompson v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
’: (LawFont.com)BrazilElectronic copies of oppositions now available on internet: (International Law Office)CanadaSam Trosow on latest CMEC copyright bulletins: (Michael Geist),ComputerWorld Canada on copyright reform: (Michael Geist),Deemed abandonment provisions pose traps for the unwary: (International Law Office),Trade mark appeals: stays and service requirements: (Canadian Trademark Blog),Franchising into Canada: (IP finance),More Champagne, anyone? [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 7:06 am
In any civil action under this title, the court in its discretion may allow the recovery of full costs by or against any party other than the United States or an officer thereof. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
City of Detroit, No. 06-2441 In a case arising from an incident in which defendants-police officers opened fire on unarmed plaintiff in his own backyard, wounding him in the chest, allegedly without warning and without cause, denial of summary judgment for officers is affirmed over claims that: 1) one officer was entitled to qualified immunity because his shot missed plaintiff; and 2) second officer should receive qualified immunity because he fired under the… [read post]
