Search for: "*house v. U. S" Results 401 - 420 of 1,421
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Department of Homeland Security's Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement [ICE] attempts to effect arrests in court houses located in New York State.U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Department of Homeland Security's Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement [ICE] attempts to effect arrests in court houses located in New York State.U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Holdings LLC  2020 NY Slip Op 30013(U) January 2, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 651794/2015 Judge Jennifer G. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 2:19 am by Peter Mahler
Advanced 23, LLC v Chambers House Partners, LLC, 2019 NY Slip Op 30173(U) [Sup Ct NY County Jan. 22, 2019]. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by IPWatchdog
NantKwest, finding that the USPTO can’t recover legal personnel fees in district court proceedings; Facebook shares drop due to a potential Federal Trade Commission injunction against messaging services integration; the Federal Circuit denies a rehearing petition on Capital One’s antitrust claims against Intellectual Ventures; House Democrats allow the USCMA free trade agreement to move towards ratification; news reports indicate that the U.S. and China have a limited… [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am by Joel R. Brandes
 Family Court Act § 412(2)(d) was amended to read as follows:  (d) "income cap" shall mean up to and including one hundred  eighty-four  thousand  dollars  of  the  payor's  annual  income; provided, however, beginning March  first,  two thousand twenty and every two years thereafter, the income cap amount shall increase by the sum of the average annual percentage changes  in  the  consumer … [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 9:02 pm by Series of Essays
Each day, people’s lives are affected by regulation. [read post]
Gerald Ford once defined an impeachable offense as “whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:43 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” If an operating agreement contains the word “shall” in the context of advancement or indemnification, the right generally should be considered “mandatory” (Comer v Krolick, 2015 NY Slip Op 32274(U) [Sup Ct NY County Dec. 2, 2015]). [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 12:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The Supreme Court later held that the Tenure Act as unconstitutional in Myers v. [read post]