Search for: "*key v. Evans"
Results 401 - 420
of 479
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2018, 4:30 am
(Privacy Shield is functionally an adequacy assurance, or an assurance that the U.S. provides an adequate level of protection for that data under Chapter V of the GDPR). [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 3:48 am
Evan Hill, Missy Ryan, Siobhán O’Grady, and Samuel Oakford report for the Washington Post. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:13 am
Evans. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 4:13 pm
The key date that the jury gave those guilty verdicts was 17 December 2003. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:17 am
Evans. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
The trial court judgment was based on a few key findings. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 10:53 am
United States, Pam Karlan in Lozman v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 12:41 pm
Naim (1956), an error later rectified in the famous case of Loving v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am
This question was addressed in Revill v Newberry [1996] QB 567. [read post]
4 May 2016, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in the case of Birchfield v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
The 1967 ruling in Loving v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
The 1967 ruling in Loving v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:23 am
” Cariou v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm
Evans-Feder, 63 F.3d 217 (3rd Cir. 1995), the Third Circuit took note of the Friedrich and Bates decisions, pointing out that in Friedrich the court focused on the child, "look[ing] back in time, not forward. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) makes its third trip to the Supreme Court today under the caption California v. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 8:34 pm
Personally, I love the DELETE key. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 2:28 am
Conclusion Historically, there has been little case law emerging from Wales on its diverging housing law – virtually no reported higher court litigation followed the Housing (Wales) Act 2014 (other than the notable Jarvis v Evans – see NL’s report here). [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 2:19 pm
” Deuel Ross argues on behalf of Evan Milligan. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:31 am
This is according to a statement made by the press service of Yevgeny V. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:47 am
’ ([59], emphasis added) The latter part of that sentence is the key: the decision is ultimately to be based on an assessment by the court (with considerable deference to the executive view) that a public hearing would pose a risk to national security. [read post]
