Search for: "A F v. State of Indiana" Results 401 - 420 of 888
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:47 am by Peter Mahler
The District Court’s opinion tells the story of peripatetic litigation over the implementation of the buy-sell agreements’ poorly conceived appraisal provisions that, like Gilbert and Sullivan’s wandering minstrel, “tuned its supple song” as the case journeyed from Michigan state court across the border to Indiana state court and then Indiana federal court. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:07 am by admin
Last week, Bayer broke its Philadelphia losing streak, with a win in Kline v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 12:45 pm by Patricia Salkin
  Finally, the Seventh Circuit upheld the district court’s ruling that the challenged permitting provisions of the sign code were severable under Indiana state law. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 12:21 am by Orin S. Kerr
The Indiana Supreme Court has handed down a decision in a compelled decryption case, Seo v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 1:14 pm
As Lyle Denniston wrote earlier this fall on SCOTUSblog.com, “[f]ew cases the [Supreme] Court might have agreed to hear w[ill] be likely to have as much real-world political impact as the newly granted case[] of Crawford v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:39 am by Rebecca Tushnet
John of Jerusalem, Knights of Malta, the Ecumenical Order, --- F. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
At least eight other states—Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, South Dakota—are also considering fair access bills, some of which would apply to payment processors, payment networks, and credit card companies and networks in addition to banks and insurers. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]