Search for: "A-MAX HOLDING COMPANY" Results 401 - 420 of 689
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
The secret threesome celebrities deserve protection | Max Mosley https://t.co/XysaQcjOSg -> “Free speech drowning”? [read post]
10 May 2016, 1:08 pm by Melinda L. McLellan and Jenna N. Felz
In 2000, to address the concerns of companies doing business across the Atlantic, the U.S. [read post]
4 May 2016, 4:41 pm by Jay
Prevents profiting by arbitration companies if they’ve been removed during an arbitration for violations of ethical rules or disclosure requirements. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 12:18 pm
The Company is unable to predict the resolution of any such arbitration. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 4:37 am by Nate Nead
The subordinated lenders, on the other hand, will attempt to max the amount of equity required in the deal. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 8:00 am by Sevens Legal
We look forward to our day in court holding Kesha accountable for her lies. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 8:00 am by Sevens Legal
We look forward to our day in court holding Kesha accountable for her lies. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 12:41 pm by Jordan M. Rand
  As companies have struggled to define themselves in this context, most have been holding out hope for a clearer, more streamlined arrangement akin to the prior EU/US safe harbor agreement. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 6:01 am by Michael Geist
The European case starts with Max Schrems, an Austrian law student, who became interested in privacy issues several years ago as a visitor at Santa Clara University in California. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/aZq03eBYJm -> Statutory damages for copyright infringement of 20k per wok infringed awarded RE/MAX v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:35 am by INFORRM
He hopes to achieve a landmark ruling similar to that obtained by Austrian privacy campaigner Max Schrems. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am by INFORRM
  The decision was, nevertheless, controversial as the all the claimants were awarded more than the previous highest damages in a privacy case (the £60,000 paid to Max Mosley in 2008. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm by Barry Sookman
The Irish High Court Decision Following the revelations about US surveillance by Edward Snowden, an Austrian resident Max Schrems complained to the Irish data Commissioner about the transfers. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 11:49 am by Sheppard Mullin
” The case resulted from a complaint by 28-year-old Austrian privacy activist Max Schrems to the Irish Data Protection Commissioner. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:17 pm by Courtney Bowman
  However, the CJEU rendered this decision as part of what’s become known as the “Max Schrems“ case. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:42 am by Alex Loomis
  As I explained last week, the plaintiff, Max Schrems, sought to invalidate the Safe Harbor Framework, the set of requirements which U.S. companies can self-certify as having met in order to transfer data freely from Europe to the United States. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE * Never too late 64 - [week ending on Sunday 20 September] – Adwords in Canada | EU Draft consultation on ISPs | "The UPC: A Panel Debate" | Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince  Lenz v Universal Music | CJEU in KitKat | Paul Burrell v Max Clifford [2015] EWHC 2001 (Ch) | Economics of Collecting Societies | Who is an… [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 6:54 am
Here's why:This group of just under a dozen employees (plus various dependents) is pretty generic: $30 doc visit co-pays, a prescription card benefit, $2500 per person deductible (max $5,000 per family). [read post]