Search for: "A. E. v. State of Alabama " Results 401 - 420 of 626
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
The Court also denied cert. in Alabama v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  That means we searched “Alabama law,” not just “Alabama. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 8:34 am by WSLL
Fenn, Judge.Representing Appellant: Diane E. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:44 am by WIMS
      The majority Appeals Court explains that these consolidated appeals focus on a Clean Air Act visible emissions regulation promulgated by the State of Alabama and submitted to EPA as a revision to Alabama's State Implementation Plan (SIP). [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 2:56 pm by Kevin Goldberg
  At this point I’m reminded of the opening statement of one Vincent LaGuardia Gambini in the fictitional trial of Alabama v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:35 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
El CCJ es una organización adscrita al “National Center for State Courts” (NCSC), entidad que organiza este evento y que agrupa los jueces presidentes de los estados de la nación americana y sus territorios. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  The Decherts are too involved in this litigation to comment publicly.There aren’t many research-oriented pharmaceutical companies based in Alabama, and after last week’s execrable decision in Wyeth, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:48 pm by PaulKostro
Alabama, 287 U.S. 45, 71-1, 53 S.Ct. 55, 65, 77 L.Ed. 158, 172 (1932) quoting Holden v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:56 am by Sanford Rosen
Alabama (1961), a death penalty right-to-counsel precursor to Gideon v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:56 am by Kiran Bhat
Alabama] decision means for sentencing law and procedures” in Alabama. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:28 pm by Robert C. Seiger
The other five states requiring use of E-Verify by all employers are Arizona, Mississippi, South Carolina, Alabama, Georgia, and North Carolina. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:49 pm
Moreover, in contrast to states like Arizona, which require employers within their states to use the federal government’s E-Verify pilot program to verify their employees’ work eligibility, in 2007 Illinois sought to prohibit use of E-Verify within the state until concerns about the accuracy, effectiveness, and privacy of the new federal database system could be resolved. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
The defendants charged in the superseding indictment and the complaint include collectors, aggregators, and owners and operators of the corrupt distribution companies who were carrying out this scheme in states including New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Florida, Texas, Massachusetts, Utah, Nevada, Louisiana, and Alabama. [read post]