Search for: "A. J. Industries, Inc. v. the United States" Results 401 - 420 of 799
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.[19] After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:15 am
United Dominion Industries, Inc., 473 F.3d 532, 538 (3d Cir. 2007).There's no comparative fault in strict liability that would reduce a verdict where the plaintiff did something stupid. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am by Marie Louise
Murray (IP finance) United States US Patent Reform America Invents Act: First to Invent v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
(ISinIP) CAFC grants en banc request to challenge written description requirement: Ariad v Lilly (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patent Docs) (Holman's Biotech IP Blog) Supreme Court asked to yank obviousness from the purview of juries: Medela AG v Kinetic Concepts, Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) All you need to know about Bilski in a 30 min podcast - debate between Prof M Risch and Prof J Sarnoff… [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am by Kelly
(Class 46)   Thailand Police, pirate tapes, poverty and politics: a sad tale (IPKat) United Kingdom EWCA decision in bulls and horns, carts and horses – but still no stay: Molnlycke Health Care v BSN Medical Ltd (PatLit) Henry replica sucks – EWHC decision in design infringement and passing off case Numatic International Ltd v Qualtex UK Ltd (jiplp) Defending the ECJ against Lord Justice Jacob: L’Oréal v Bellure (jiplp) British… [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:00 am by admin
-Scott Clements, Reserve Studies Inc. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 4:52 am by INFORRM
In Lockton v Persons Unknown and Google Inc [2009] EWHC 3423 (QB). the court questioned whether it had jurisdiction to make an order against a company based in the United States without a place of business in England. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Patent Prospector) (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Techdirt) (Hal Wegner) Reactions to Patent Reform Bill 2009 (IP Watchdog) (Patent Baristas) (IP Watchdog) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O)    Global Global - General World IP Day, 26 April, approaching (IPKat)  … [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(IP finance) Withdrawing patent applications – a matter of priority (IPKat)   United States US General U.S. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:00 pm by Richard J. Andreano, Jr.
Quicken Loans, Inc., the United States Supreme Court ruled that RESPA section 8 does not prohibit a single party from marking up the cost of a settlement service. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 2:01 pm by Richard J. Andreano, Jr.
Quicken Loans, Inc., the United States Supreme Court ruled that RESPA section 8 does not prohibit a single service provider from marking up the cost of a settlement service, such as a credit report. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am by Marie Louise
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc (Docket Report) District Court N D Texas: False marking intent to deceive may be inferred from marking of expired patent numbers: Patent Compliance Group Inc. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
(Class 46) Trading Standards officers uses new inspection powers granted under Copyright, Designs and Patent Act (Out-Law)   United States US General IP legislation to watch in 2009 (Law360) IP cases to follow in 2009 (Law360) US Trade Representative issues statement on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ContentAgenda) Does the Federal Circuit need a fresh viewpoint? [read post]
11 May 2010, 5:39 pm by Press Releases
The second morning panel will examine the impact of the Supreme Court’s 2006 opinion in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog had an article on the recently discontinued representative claim SMO v TikTok Inc and Others [2022] EWHC 489 (QB). [read post]