Search for: "ACE LTD" Results 401 - 420 of 768
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2020, 1:04 pm by Giles Peaker
The Claimant argued Street v Mountford (1985) 1 AC 809, [1985] UKHL 4 and so that “the only intention which is relevant is the intention demonstrated by the agreement to grant exclusive possession for a term at a rent”. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:07 pm by Giles Peaker
Ghana Commercial Finance Ltd v Sawyer & Anr [2014] EWCA Civ 489 [Not on Bailii yet. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:07 pm by Giles Peaker
Ghana Commercial Finance Ltd v Sawyer & Anr [2014] EWCA Civ 489 [Not on Bailii yet. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:26 am by shirley
This was the case in Daimler Co Ltd v Continental Tyre and Rubber Co (Great Britain) Ltd 1916 2 AC 307. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
The rule stands as an exception to the general practice governing applications for interim injunctions in civil proceedings established in American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd ([1975] AC 396 (HL)), whereby the court considers whether there is a serious issue to be tried and, if so, where the balance of convenience or justice lies. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm by Giles Peaker
On that, the guidance for exercising the equitable jurisdiction was, as per Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd [1992] 1 AC 494, and Gibbs v Lakeside Developments Ltd [2019] 4 WLR 6, that the statutory 6 month period under the Common Law Procedure Act 1852 was the base line for what was reasonable. although an application for relief from forfeiture may be brought more than six months after possession has been taken by the landlords so long as the elasticity of… [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 10:40 am by J
Brock v Wollams [1949] 2 KB 388 and, more recently, Fitzpatrick v Stirling HA Ltd [2001] 1 AC 27 were clear authority for the generous approach to be taken when construing that phrase. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 10:40 am by J
Brock v Wollams [1949] 2 KB 388 and, more recently, Fitzpatrick v Stirling HA Ltd [2001] 1 AC 27 were clear authority for the generous approach to be taken when construing that phrase. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:34 am by Sean Wajert
Ltd. for drywall manufactured in 2005, Taian Taishan Plasterboard Co. [read post]
14 May 2009, 6:15 am
The famous case of Red House Farms (Thorndon) Ltd v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 1:52 pm by Simone Nash (Toronto)
The famous House of Lords decision, Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass, [1972] AC 153 (which was later criticized as being overly-stringent) held that the requisite mental and conduct elements are only attributable to the entity if they can be traced to the top of the corporate hierarchy. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 10:57 am by Michael S. Levine and Daniel Hentschel
 At the time, Solera had primary and excess D&O liability insurance policies issued by a group of insurers, including Chubb Ltd. units, Ace American Insurance Co. and Federal Insurance Co. [read post]
2 May 2007, 8:04 am
In recent years, English law has adapted the action for breach of confidence to provide a remedy for the unauthorized disclosure of personal information: see Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 8:08 pm
The Court of Appeal found: The Act did not define the meaning of “harassment”, but subsequent case law found it to comprise conduct that was oppressive, unreasonable or unacceptable, Thomas v News Group Newspapers Ltd (2001) EWCA Civ 1233, (2002) EMLR 4 and     Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Trust (2006) UKHL 34, (2007) 1 AC 224   applied. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 8:51 am by Andrée Blais
  Private financing for the project is comprised of approximately (a) $1.2 billion in private activity bonds issued by the California Municipal Finance Authority on behalf of LINXS; (b) a $270 million construction period credit facility with loan commitments from Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce New York Branch, Mizuho Bank Ltd., Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, Korea Development Bank and Toronto-Dominion Bank; and (c) an aggregate equity contribution of $103 million secured by… [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 1:28 pm
Now in a Liverpool County Court Circuit Judge decision in Helena Housing Ltd v Mower and Molyneux gives an alternative argument. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 1:52 pm by Simone Nash (Toronto)
The famous House of Lords decision, Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass, [1972] AC 153 (which was later criticized as being overly-stringent) held that the requisite mental and conduct elements are only attributable to the entity if they can be traced to the top of the corporate hierarchy. [read post]