Search for: "ALL PLAINTIFFS " Results 401 - 420 of 94,730
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2010, 4:07 pm by The Settlement Channel
In short, if all you bring to the table is that you are less rotten and less crooked than the other guy, you can probably expect to be replaced when your product is no longer competitive. ( Oh wait, thats where we are now, right?) [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 4:07 pm by The Settlement Channel
In short, if all you bring to the table is that you are less rotten and less crooked than the other guy, you can probably expect to be replaced when your product is no longer competitive. ( Oh wait, thats where we are now, right?) [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 9:30 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
  In response, the plaintiff filed an action to impose a constructive or resulting trust over the property, claiming that he had been the property’s rightful owner all along. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 5:22 am
 The case may, therefore, turn on facts emphasized in the brief and all but ignored by the 8th Circuit. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:21 pm by Bruce Carton
We'll hear now from counsel for the the plaintiff: Plaintiff's Counsel: The restaurant offered "all you can eat sushi for $28," and my client accepted. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:37 pm by Andrew Frisch
As such the court concluded: On summary judgment, all reasonable inferences must be made in favor of the non-moving party and, as we have held in the past, a plaintiff’s testimony alone may be sufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact thereby defeating a defendant’s motion for summary judgment. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:37 pm by Andrew Frisch
As such the court concluded: On summary judgment, all reasonable inferences must be made in favor of the non-moving party and, as we have held in the past, a plaintiff’s testimony alone may be sufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact thereby defeating a defendant’s motion for summary judgment. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:18 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
” After making these rulings, the trial court granted summary judgment to defendants on all claims, finding that plaintiff could not show a genuine issue of material fact. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 6:37 am by Andrew Frisch
Nevertheless, the Court was troubled by Defendants’ actions and ordered Defendants to “immediately halt the destruction of any Current Payroll Records” and produce all payroll records to Plaintiff on a bi-weekly basis. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 1:47 pm by David Walk
Plaintiffs’ counsel tried to salvage this opinion by characterizing it as “non-substantive testimony,” but the court rejected that nonsense, finding that the requirements of Daubert apply to all proffered expert testimony. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  This is the fallacy of the excluded middle: in the former situation, even crediting all the evidence, the plaintiff couldn’t meet its burden of proof at trial on the merits; in the latter, it might be the case that, depending on which evidence you credited, the plaintiff could meet its burden. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 12:15 pm by Gregory B. Williams
December 4, 2020), the Court denied the motion of plaintiff to reconsider its prior order dismissing all counts of the complaint with prejudice. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 5:42 pm by Curt Cutting
  He accepted a settlement with Shell in which Shell agreed to refund all the rent that plaintiff paid on his gas station from 1998 through 2001. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 4:44 am by Charles Sartain
The discovery rule is sometimes available to the plaintiff. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:39 am by Kevin Schmidt
— “The Court will grant the news-organization Plaintiffs’ Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and CPI’s Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and order that Defendant release the names, addresses, and precise loan amounts of all individuals and entities that obtained PPP and EIDL COVID-related loans by November 19, 2020. [read post]
In this action, while vacating a district court’s order dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint, the Second Circuit found that when the defendant asserts a “facial” challenge to standing, the courts should continue to draw from the pleadings all reasonable inferences in the plaintiff’s favor and are to presume that general allegations embrace those specific facts that are necessary to support the claim. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 7:12 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
She argued that in making the summary judgment determination, all of the evidence should be construed in her favor as the non-moving party, and when so viewed, there was sufficient evidence to find that the defendant’s negligence caused her fall. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 10:00 am by Nat
The two initiators of the common law are the plaintiff and the attorney. [read post]