Search for: "AUSTIN v. PAGE" Results 401 - 420 of 490
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2010, 8:30 pm by Craig Robins
“A careful review,” the judge wrote in a four-page order, “reveals a number of glaring discrepancies and unexplained issues of substance. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 11:10 am by Ian Bartrum
On my first, and concededly very rough, cut through Justice Kennedy's opinion in Citizens United, I was interested in his justification for overruling Austin v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
You can wrap it around you for warmth as you bound across the cold moons of Jaglan Beta; you can lie on it on the brilliant marble-sanded beaches of Santraginus V, inhaling the heady sea vapors; you can sleep under it beneath the stars which shine so redly on the desert world of Kakrafoon; use it to sail a miniraft down the slow heavy River Moth; wet it for use in hand-to-hand-combat; wrap it round your head to ward off noxious fumes or avoid the gaze of the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of… [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
You can wrap it around you for warmth as you bound across the cold moons of Jaglan Beta; you can lie on it on the brilliant marble-sanded beaches of Santraginus V, inhaling the heady sea vapors; you can sleep under it beneath the stars which shine so redly on the desert world of Kakrafoon; use it to sail a miniraft down the slow heavy River Moth; wet it for use in hand-to-hand-combat; wrap it round your head to ward off noxious fumes or avoid the gaze of the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of… [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:46 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Jonathan Adler summarizes the case: The Court held 5–4 that restrictions on independent corporate expenditures in political campaigns are unconstitutional, overruling Austin v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 7:26 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The Court held 5-4 that restrictions on independent corporate expenditures in political campaigns are unconstitutional, overruling Austin v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 7:52 pm
Page references are to the Spanish-language decision; an English version is expected soon. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am by Ray Mullman
  That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EPO: Should green technology be subject to compulsory licensing? [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/   Highlights this week included: US Supreme Court refuses to hear Chicago Redskins complaint: Suzan Harjo v. [read post]