Search for: "Adams v. New York" Results 401 - 420 of 2,482
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2020, 5:58 am by James Romoser
Here’s a round-up of other Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: The Affordable Care Act Faces Another Supreme Court Test (Adam Liptak & Abby Goodnough, The New York Times) Affordable Care Act Faces Latest Test in Supreme Court (Jess Bravin & Stephanie Armour, The Wall Street Journal) Ten years after passage, Affordable Care Act seems likely to survive latest Supreme Court challenge (Richard Wolf, USA Today) Will This… [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 5:42 pm by Howard Bashman
“Supreme Court Weighs Legacy of Same-Sex Marriage Case; The justices considered whether a city may exclude a Catholic social services agency from its foster care system because it refuses to work with gay couples”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 1:36 pm by Howard Bashman
“Supreme Court Considers How to Decide if Teenagers Should Serve Life Without Parole; The justices considered precedents that said only ‘permanently incorrigible’ juvenile offenders ought be sentenced to die in prison”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am by Andy Foreman
[xiii] And on Sept. 21, the United Kingdom’s Law Commission announced the start of “two new projects to ensure that English law can accommodate two emerging technologies that could [revolutionize] commerce: smart contracts and digital assets. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 3:40 am by Peter Mahler
Instead, in New York, only non-judicial expulsion is recognized and only if authorized by the operating agreement. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm by Peter Jacobs
” In District of Columbia v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Wegman, a former lawyer who is now on the editorial board of the New York Times, has written, as Jack Rakove suggests, a book designed for the widest audience. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
            In these two very different books, Keyssar and the New York Times journalist Jesse Wegman struggle with the common problem that Keyssar’s title captures so well: Why Do We Still Have the Electoral College? [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 8:08 am by Jonathan Bailey
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Supreme Court Hears Copyright Battle Between Google and Oracle First off today, Adam Liptak at The New York Times reports that the Supreme Court of the United States heard arguments in the Google v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 8:32 am by James Romoser
On the second day of the Supreme Court’s new term, the justices heard arguments in Rutledge v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 4:38 pm by Howard Bashman
“Supreme Court Hears Case of Muslims on No-Fly List; The justices weighed whether a 1993 law protecting religious freedom allows suits seeking money from federal agents”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:38 am by James Romoser
Adams, a First Amendment case about whether Delaware can choose its state judges based on party affiliation, and Texas v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 4:48 pm by Howard Bashman
“Supreme Court Starts Term With Case on the Politics of Judging; The justices considered two provisions of Delaware’s Constitution aimed at ensuring partisan balance on the state’s courts”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 4:02 pm by Howard Bashman
“Amy Coney Barrett, Trump’s Supreme Court Pick, Signed Anti-Abortion Ad; Her statement appears to be the most direct evidence of her personal views, ones she has vowed to set aside on the bench”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 3:53 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Several drivers who worked in cities including Chicago, Portland, and New York filed two suits against Grubhub, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act for failing to pay overtime. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 6:14 am by James Romoser
In other coverage of the list, Adam Liptak of the New York Times notes that it “was issued although there is no current vacancy, suggesting that the move had at least partly political aims. [read post]