Search for: "Ahmed v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 597
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2012, 11:30 am
Tex. 1990), aff'd sub. nom., U.S. v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 7:32 am
The latest statement from the defense in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:35 am
Ahmed that the state's noneconomic damages cap for medical malpractice or medical negligence cases was constitutional. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:25 am
The standard for removal and subsequent trial in absentia in both federal and U.S. military courts is Illinois v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:46 am
United States may be moot, the D.C. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:53 am
For example, on March 12, 2012, the Ninth Circuit handed down its opinion in United States v Ressam, 2012 WL 762986 (9th Cir. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm
The case (Sanders v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 7:57 am
In Sanders v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 5:52 am
In the courts R (on the application of Amada Bizimana) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 414. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:51 am
DoD Press Release, here, announces: The Department of Defense announced today that the convening authority, Office of Military Commissions, referred charges to a military commission in the case of “United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:54 am
A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in M.Karunanidhi v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 9:34 pm
While distinguishing the dicta laid down in Mohammed Ahmed v Atma Ram Chauhan, the Delhi High Court observed that the facts therein related to the UP Rent Act and its ratio has no application to Delhi. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 2:00 pm
Shakeel Ahmad and Syed Mubarak Ahmed v R [2012] EWCA Crim 391 March 2, 2012. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:24 am
Ahmed White’s critique proceeds along roughly these lines. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
Since both the United States and India are federations, invariably the Superior Courts in those jurisdictions are called on to decide when there appears to be any conflict between state and federal legislation or a question of legislative competence arises. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
Gutehoffnungshutte GmbH, 141 F.3d 1434 (11th Cir. 1998) (German manufacturer was party to the arbitration); Yusuf Ahmed Alghanim & Sons, WLL v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:53 am
He recalls an Arabic flyer prepared by the State Department after the Cole bombing and distributed on the ground in Yemen, that erroneously told locals not to cooperate with Americans. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:57 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:34 pm
Ultimately the case turned on whether the interference was proportionate, and the Secretary’s decision had failed the requirements of the proportionality principle as summarised in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am
Again, the context, of course, is the detention by the State of children and young persons. [read post]
