Search for: "Am. Federation of State, Etc. v. State, Etc." Results 401 - 420 of 588
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
In anticipation or in response, nineteen states have already banned telemedicine visits for abortion medication, and others have put limits on the practice, presumably in the expectation that the Supreme Court will overrule Roe v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:07 pm by Howard Knopf
Re:Sound was seeking “roughly $86 million per year” from  fitness facility operators, etc. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 7:30 am
Wade and progeny were wrongly decided and the Supreme Court should now affirm there is no federal constitutional right to abortion and leave the issue to state legislatures. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Insureds who conduct such countermeasures may themselves be in violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act or other state and federal regulations. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 7:22 am by George Lenard
Miles, III, spells out exactly how the Stored Communications Act could apply to employers requesting Facebook passwords: In Pietrylo v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 1:32 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
A member will ask: “why am I paying dues when the guy across the street is copying and pasting? [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 8:57 pm by Ray Dowd
As of July 26, 2010 it became legal in the United States to use programs protected by this method without needing a dongle as according to the United States this technology is obsolete. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am by Howard Knopf
In fairness to the Board, part of this delay was due to the detour through the Federal Court of Appeal on the issue of crown immunity. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:06 pm
  This point is illustrated by a relatively recent case out of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, Lewis v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am by INFORRM
Clause 7 of Draft Defamation Bill – which deals with jurisdiction – is of particular interest and reads in part: “Action against a person not domiciled in the UK or a Member State etc (1) This section applies to an action for defamation against a person who is not domiciled? [read post]