Search for: "Amendment to Florida Rules of Judicial Administration" Results 401 - 420 of 575
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2012, 6:40 am by Bill Raftery
Bill Provisions Status Alabama SB 33 (Constitutional Amendment) Enacts American and Alabama Laws for Alabama Courts Amendment. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
   In the Florida case, when that case was appealed, the Eleventh Circuit Court did not even discuss the question. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:33 am by Bill Raftery
” The other activity, or lack thereof, was in Florida where that state’s multiple efforts failed to advance before that legislature adjourned. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 11:19 am by Bill Raftery
(Committee recommends passage) CACR 26 (Constitutional Amendment) Repeals constitutional provision authorizing the chief justice of the supreme court to make rules governing the administration of all the courts. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:00 am by Bill Raftery
Bans in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Missouri, and New Hampshire met with committee approval, while Florida HB 1209 was approved by the full House yesterday (March 1). [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 6:03 am by Bill Raftery
Provides “Any court, arbitration, tribunal or administrative agency ruling or decision shall violate the public policy of this state and be void and unenforceable if the court, arbitration, tribunal or administrative agency bases its rulings or decisions in the matter at issue in whole or in part on any law, legal code or system that would not grant the parties affected by the ruling or decision the same fundamental liberties, rights and privileges… [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by Bill Raftery
Alabama SB 33 (Constitutional Amendment) Enacts American and Alabama Laws for Alabama Courts Amendment. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 4:43 am by Leslie Sammis
HB 681 and SB 864"If it becomes law, Florida Senate Bill SB 864 would make some radical changes to the rules governing administrative suspensions after a DUI arrest. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 6:57 am by Conor McEvily
Environmental Protection Agency, in which the Court will consider whether a landowner who has been issued an administrative compliance order by the Environmental Protection Agency for violating environmental laws may challenge the order in court before the EPA seeks judicial enforcement. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:27 am by William McGrath
Becker "provided comments on a proposed amendment to [the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970] that would have severely curtailed the Trustee's power to bring clawback suits against individuals like him in the Madoff Liquidation. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:39 am by Bill Raftery
No Arizona SCR 1010 (Constitutional Amendment) Requires courts, when making judicial decisions, to uphold and adhere to the laws of the U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:15 am by Nicole Huberfeld
’  Even as it revitalized judicial enforcement of the Tenth Amendment in cases such as New York and Printz, the Court treated spending as an exception by stating that the federal government could basically buy state cooperation without running afoul of the Tenth Amendment. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:24 am by South Florida Lawyers
The financial and emotional challenges of unemployment ought to be enough without compounding the effect by putting the claimants through a futile administrative and judicial labyrinth. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:26 am by Nicole Huberfeld
I had intended to address Douglas next, as it is a nice gateway for discussing Florida v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am by Webmaster
Microsoft, the Federal Circuit rejected the so-called “25 Percent Rule of Thumb” that suggested that in a hypothetical negotiation over reasonable royalties, a good starting point is to assume a profit split of 25% to the patentee and 75% to the infringer. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 7:57 am by Bill Raftery
No Arizona SCR 1010 (Constitutional Amendment) Requires courts, when making judicial decisions, to uphold and adhere to the laws of the U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:03 am
But analogous questions have arisen under the constitutions of other states, and the majority rule is that educational adequacy provisions in state constitutions are judicially enforceable. [read post]