Search for: "Amendment to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure" Results 401 - 420 of 530
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am by Jeff Gamso
It is virtually self-evident to me now that no combination of procedural rules or substantive regulations ever can save the death penalty from its inherent constitutional deficiencies. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am by Jeff Gamso
It is virtually self-evident to me now that no combination of procedural rules or substantive regulations ever can save the death penalty from its inherent constitutional deficiencies. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
(Ron Coleman’s Likelihood of Confusion) ONEL – Pieter Veeze’s 2010 Markenforum speech (Class 46) France Cour d’appel Paris: French law implementing London Protocol procedural so to be enforced immediately with retroactive effect: Unilever v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm by Law Lady
Supreme Court of Florida.Rules of Juvenile Procedure -- Amendment -- Detention hearing -- Presence of counselIN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE 8.010. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm by cdw
The appellate court reversed for noncompliance with the rule, ordering a new trial. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 7:45 pm by cdw
App.10/1/2010) State concedes error as the trial court erred in failing to rule on all of the postconviction claims before it. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 10:27 am by Susan Brenner
Hunter Ambulance, Inc., 226 A.D.2d 175, 640 N.Y.S.2d 114 (New York Appellate Division 1996)). [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 9:45 am
Any other interpretation flies in the face of the stated intent for construction of the procedural rules. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
Provincial Government of MarinduqueDocket: 09-944Issue(s): Whether federal courts have jurisdiction to rule on a case that involves potential foreign policy issues because a foreign government is involved.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' supplemental briefPetitioners' reply Title: Louisiana Safety Association of Timbermen – Self Insurers Fund v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 7:40 pm by cdw
The prosecutor deliberately solicited opinions of the victims concerning the appropriate punishment for appellant in violation of the Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth amendments to the Federal Constitution, Article 3, Sections 14, 26, and 28 of the Mississippi Constitution, Miss. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 12:13 am by The Complex Litigator
The Court first examined commonality: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a)(2) provides that “questions of law or fact common to the class” are a prerequisite to class certification. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm by James R. Marsh
Ciavarella[17] pulls no punches: With utter disdain for the rule of law, defendants Mark A. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm by David M. McLain
This article provides an overview of this new law.Act SummaryH.B 10-1394 (Construction Professional Commercial Liability Insurance Act or Act) amends CDARA and the Colorado Insurance Code by codifying certain interpretive rules for occurrence-based liability policies insuring construction professionals. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
”Finally, Olson said, “I would not rule that out, Justice Stevens. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:36 pm by carie
Deplorably, in the United Stated there is a lack of meaningful appellate review in commutation proceedings. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:00 am by Brian Stull, Capital Punishment Project
Georgia (PDF), he dissented when the court refused to take up a case showing that the Georgia Supreme Court had stopped conducting the meaningful appellate review of death sentences it had promised when the Supreme Court had upheld Georgia capital procedures. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm by cdw
Gardner’s contention that this court may set aside the procedural rules of the PCRA in the interests of justice and are unpersuaded that the interests of justice require us to engage in the scope of review that he requests. [read post]
16 May 2010, 1:33 pm by Juan Antunez
Because probate is an in rem proceeding where the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure generally don't apply. [read post]